|
|
|
|
|
|
#171557 - 10/06/01 04:03 AM
Re: Yamaha PSR2000 vs. Korg PA-80
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/27/01
Posts: 2227
|
If you are doing computer based recording as a songwriter, you have to also take into account, the difference in price and what you can get for the money. If the PSR 2000 is at least $600 cheaper when you factor in purchasing the hard drive and vocalizer for the PA80, you should consider what you can get for that $600. I purchased Gigastudio and some great piano samples and acoustic guitar samples. When I edit my songs, I use my PSR 2000 to trigger the lush acoustic guitars and real bass sounds that Gigastudio can offer. All in all, you should think about what goodies you can get for the same price. For example, even though a Mercedes beats a Toyota Camry, you can buy a family sized boat with your Camry and still pay the same price. You should do a search at this website with keywords so you can find out more about what other peoples' impressions are of these keyboards. Well, since almost no one has the PSR 2000, you can search for PSR 740, and realize that the PSR 2000 is a souped up version. It has about 20 more of Yamaha's newest voices, 20 more onboard styles, the capacity to hold about 20 more user styles, easy access to styles on your floppy disk, and improved access of voice and style registrations, and better sequencing features.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171558 - 10/06/01 09:29 PM
Re: Yamaha PSR2000 vs. Korg PA-80
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
I own both the PSR740 and the PA80. For my own tastes, overall, I prefer the sounds of the PA80 over the 740, but as many have said before me, sounds are subjective and a matter of personal taste. In particular I like the drums, organs, and electric guitars and basses quite a bit better, with most of the other sounds fairly close. I also like the full synth edit capability of the PA80. This is not to say that I don't like most of the sounds on the 740. I do like them. I haven't tried the 2000 yet, but having played around extensively with the Motif and 9000 series, I wouldn't expect that the sounds will be much different on the 2000, although I realize that there are a few new ones that the 740 doesn't have. I cannot comment much on the features, suffice it to say the PA80 has many more than the 740 but still could benefit from a few upgrades to the current O/S. The PA80 has much more detail in the styles than the 740..many 8 bar styles as opposed to 1 and 2 bar yamaha styles. I guess for some, simpler might be better, depending on what you want to use the styles for, ( simple styles work very well on many of the standards that gigging musicians might play for an audience ), but for me the PA80 styles are much more complex and varied and for me that works well. The 740 is a very good board to just plug in and play though. It is a very simple board to operate, and I too have made quite a few good sounding tunes with it, enhanced by my xg editing software. Although the 2000 will have more features than the 740, I would expect that it too will be an easy board to work with. The PA80 has a steeper learning curve and is quite a bit more complicated, especially in using the different sequencer modes and also in editing sounds and creating new ones from scratch using the raw samples.
Like so many have said before, it is very beneficial if at all possible to try the boards out side by side. I also realize that this is not possible for some of us. The next best thing is to compare with what you can find on the net, operating manuals, sound samples ( the 9000 and 740 series should give you a fairly good idea if not completely accurate ), and then when you do make a choice, be sure to order your board from a dealer who will accept a return within a specified period ( 30 days is a good time period ), so that if you do not care for the board you can return it for full value. Good luck..
"Korg" AJ
[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 10-06-2001).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|