|
|
|
|
|
|
#198210 - 01/03/03 11:33 AM
Re: Digitech
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
I've been using the Digitech Midi-Vocalist for about five years and for live performances, it's tough to beat. Someone said they were made by the same outfit that produced the vocal processors in the PSR 740 and PSR-2000, and this may be the case. However, the difference in the live sound quality is significant--even after the PSR processor is tuned. Personally, I'll stick with the Digitech Midi-Vocalist--it does everything I need and then some.
Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#198215 - 01/04/03 10:28 AM
Re: Digitech
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Thanks for the heads up on the Digitech VR Dave. After reading what you said, I went to their website, looked up the specs and called my local music store. He has one in stock and I'm headed there as we speak to pick one up. He too says it's a vast improvement over the standard midi vocalist and high recommends the VR. I also agree that the built in vocal processors, even when tweeked and fine tuned, do not produce the same quality as the separate units. There is a significant difference in the quality of the vocals. Thanks again for the heads-up and I'll post my findings on the forum sometime next week.
Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#198218 - 01/05/03 09:22 PM
Re: Digitech
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 12800
Loc: Penn Yan, NY
|
The voice Prism is superior in many ways, but in a live setting ... there is a MAJOR drawback to using it. When you change patches, the signal is muted for a second. Effects stop - voice stops ..... not a pretty sight for a quick change in the middle of a phrase. If you just leave an edit window open, and turn a particular voice on or off in real time ... it's fine, but a program change makes it hiccup.
Now, for the good stuff:
1)FAR superior effects and more of them 2)better control of voice formant (gender) 3)more real time parameters with dedicated knobs - effects, level, pan, whatever... 4)phantom power 5)mic mute button(great on breaks) 6)overal tone of voices is more realistic than the competition, but it's NOT earth shattering. A fine tuned ear will appreciate the difference. 7)GREAT screen - color, bolness ... easy to read. Really easy on the eyes in the dark.
In short ..... the TC is a much better piece. Will it make you sound MUCH better in a live performance? Hard to tell - the subtleties may not come across as dominant in all cases.
My advice is to ALWAYS keep the lead vocal just ABOVE the harmonies(volume setting)so the realism is not lost. All harmonizers are a little fake sounding by them selves .... the trick is .... never let them work, BY THEMSELVES ! Keep them tightly woven around your lead vocal and sing believable phrases that make sense in a harmony arrangement. Don't just expect to hit the button and sound like the Beach Boys .... ain't ginna happen, my friend. Vocal arranging is an art in itself. In my world - it's the MOST important part of any performance.
_________________________
No longer monitoring this forum. Please visit www.daveboydmusic.com for contact info
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|