The Mediastation does sound interesting because of the open architecture format allowing the ability to further upgrade the keyboard without having to buy a new board. It is based on the same concept as the OpenLabs Neko.
What really holds me back from even considering a Mediastation is the lack of good quality sound demos. I also don't think the Neko has any Arranger ability although on their web site they talk about it having 'auto arrangement'.
When I think of a Mediastation or Neko I basically think of them as Workstations with the Mediastation having a smattering of arranger capability.
The other big gripe I have with both of them is their Companies lack of resolve to post professionally produced sound demos of their Boards. For the last couple years or so OpenLabs has showcased the Neko at NAMM but everytime the demonstrations have just been talking about its functions with NO audio demos whatsoever. And the sparse demos on their web site are mediocre at best. I for one would never purchase something from a Company who apparently has such a lack of confidence in their products sound producing capability that they won't even demo the sounds live such as at NAMM where they have the world as their audience. And maybe that is the main reason they DIDN'T do any sound demos at NAMM for fear of revealing the Neko's sub-par sounds to a watching world who would needless to say after having heard it would have nothing further to do with it or the company it represents. Instead the Neko and Mediastation are wrapped in a shroud of mystery with them trying to convince people of the Neko and Mediastations high technology appeal instead of the fundamental reason which should be the quality of sounds it has. All the features in the world don't mean diddly squat if it doesn't sound good.
They may sell some but in my opinion they need to change the way they market them [READ: let people 'hear' what they're capable of doing and expound on (in the case of the Mediastation) - its "Arranger" capability and integration in a professional live setting] before, in my opinion, they will reach a mass audience of people who will be fully convinced enough to purchase one.
Craig's experience with the Mediastation further bolsters the reason why Lionstrac doesn't want to do live sound or video demonstrations of the Mediastation. If they did then the cat would finally be out of the bag and their minimal appeal to a technology minded audience would suddenly be non-existent for lack of backing up their technology with professional quality sample based sounds for which and in reality a Keyboard's main function is made and used for. Apparently not according to OpenLabs and Lionstrac though.
Btw, the Mediastation has had a video presentation using Native Instruments B4 plug in. But that is a far cry from knowing how the actual sample based sounds on the Mediastation sound.
Someone just posted a thread about using Synthogy's Ivory with a Kawai MP4 as the Controller. The .mp3 sounded great but the fact of the matter is the Kawai is not the one producing the sound but on the contrary Synthogy's Ivory is. The Kawai is just the Controller. So who is the hero the Kawai or Synthogy's Ivory?
Why Synthogy's Ivory of course. Nevertheless the Kawai MP4 and also Jim's ES4
has really good sounds of its own. Can we say that about the Lionstrac or Neko? So far the evidence is not forthcoming.
Best regards,
Mike
[This message has been edited by keybplayer (edited 06-07-2006).]