|
|
|
|
|
|
#201934 - 06/11/07 04:25 AM
Re: Korg PA800 Review
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 1675
Loc: Milford, CT, USA
|
If you look at all computer driven products, such as routers, computers, and such, there are always some type of software revision,
To say that a company did it right and there are no possible enhancements of fixes is a pretty bold statement.
Sure the T2 works great without any "bugs" but is it perfect, NO. Could things be enhanced or changed , sure. Because if the answer is no, then there is no reason for a T3
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201937 - 06/11/07 12:12 PM
Re: Korg PA800 Review
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14268
Loc: NW Florida
|
Once again, I tend to agree... A manufacturer is not obliged to revise a working product. Where is the profit in that?
However, as new feature development progresses slowly towards a new model, manufacturers will sometimes (especially when they HAVE to bring out a new OS to correct poorly designed features and squash bugs) incorporate some of the new features to 'beta-test' them before the new product launch. And you will often see this when a new generation of product first appears, like my G70.
However, the T2 is a second-generation product, so many of the 'fixes' and improvements from the T1 have already been incorporated, leaving them with a mature, reasonably bug-free product (or at least, T2 owners are VERY tight-lipped about any unfixed bugs, unlike us Roland users!), so unless Yamaha want to lose sales of the T3 by releasing the new features for free, they are likely to just wait until the new model is ready...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|