Originally posted by Exound:
What do you mean by that? I've never heard the Psr 3k ,but I'm satisfied with the realtime functions of the PA1x, don't know what's wrong with it.
weight,2 fills only(and are not natural),useless pads(you can play sequenced parts in yam),SMF playback and arranger mode doesnt work toghether(In yam-yes,when playing back a SMF song you change the drums to a build in style so your Rock SMF (all tracks)will play with a pop or even a Tango beat without a problem makes songs more interesting in live according to mood of the audience-) and alot more like millions of free user styles for Yam.
Ex PA 80 users will compare with their current 2100 and 3K.
Of course PA1x sounds better,better HM board,and other options -so it's in different catagory but 1500-2000$ difference can buy you a Triton Extreme/used triton studio(with a little extra) ,and a mid price TC HM board which will again blow PA1x(and you'll be happier in studio for having seperate and better pro sounding/functional studio gear) .
I love korg and been a korg and roland arranger user for more than a decade.
But I never knew that some functions of PSR excist and were never possible with Korg or even roland.And they(PSR)still do look like toys(except for 9000 pro).
PSR is relatively thinner sounding(most sounds) compared to Korg(some diehard fans may disagree) but it's real time functions and versatility made it up for live gigs which made them used by arranger giggers.
If you have 3k,you'll find your self playing and singing more outdoors and friends house/parties without thinking twice about carrying expensive and heavy board.
Peace.Enjoy making music both indoor and outdoor.
[This message has been edited by jamman (edited 08-27-2004).]