|
|
|
|
|
|
#233304 - 04/30/08 03:45 PM
Re: Deebach..
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
The problem isn't so much assembling the components, but getting all of them to talk fluently to each other. For one reason or another, ever since the arranger manufacturers stopped making arranger MODULES, the MIDI implementation on them has got poorer and poorer, as they assume (probably correctly, in most cases) that these will be standalone units with nary a single thing EVER hooked up to them.
Add to that that the majority of MIDI remote keyboards have all the controls on the TOP, rather than at the sides or detachable, and it is difficult to get them in close enough to recreate the 'organ experience', where close spaced manuals are what make moving around so easy.
One thing I have been trying to get to arranger manufacturers attention (and I hope you all try as well) is the ability to plug in a dumb MIDI keyboard, one MIDI channel, no PC#'s, and have the arranger map the splits and layers, etc. to that one keyboard. It's what they do with their own internal keyboard, being able to do it to a secondary keyboard would open out all kinds of possibilities.
Want to play PianoStyle Mode, but on a weighted 88? (for you, Ian!)... There are quite considerable programming hoops you have to jump through to achieve this with a remote keyboard. Want to mirror the arranger's main keyboard on a second arranger (and combine the two)? Damn near impossible, nowadays (but it didn't used to be).
Want something MORE than what your arranger gives you as a completely isolated keyboard? Scream blue bloody murder at the manufacturers. Because, every model that comes out is just that bit less capable than previous models, and this trend won't change until you let them know you want more...!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233306 - 04/30/08 04:32 PM
Re: Deebach..
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
Bill, that's a great solution, as long as you want simple one sound per manual, but once you get into more sophisticated splits and layers (like we see in some of the better Wersi demos), you need the MAIN arranger to be able to map that on the secondary keyboard for you, and also chose whether the chord recognition is coming from the lower end of the UPR manual, or LWR one (or both, or neither, or a combination of LWR and pedals, etc., etc.).
You need registration changes from ONE place to be able to do all that, not different commands from the arranger, lower manual keyboard, and pedals. Integration is what makes the organ such a powerful tool. Lose that, and you are simply running a normal multi-keyboard rig, and one thats' main sound-source is NOT set up well for this purpose...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|