|
|
|
|
|
|
#257125 - 02/20/09 05:35 PM
Re: Tyros3 connected to L1 : Amazing!!
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Good Lord, if I hear one more inaccurate posting on stereo, I'm gonna go postal! Look, anyone with a stereo can prove this to themselves. Make a CD with ONE tune done twice. First version stereo, second version mono (any audio editor will do this easily). Now stand ANYWHERE in your living room, and switch between the two versions. To get the BEST stereo effect, yes, you should sit, stand, dance, whatever, at a point in an equatorial triangle between the speakers. But standing almost anywhere else in the room, short of right next to one of the speakers, you WILL hear a difference between mono and stereo. The idea that unless you stand in that one 'sweet spot' you won't hear it at all is simply ridiculous...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257130 - 02/20/09 09:06 PM
Re: Tyros3 connected to L1 : Amazing!!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/24/08
Posts: 1099
Loc: Myrtle beach SC
|
Originally posted by Diki: Good Lord, if I hear one more inaccurate posting on stereo, I'm gonna go postal!
Look, anyone with a stereo can prove this to themselves. Make a CD with ONE tune done twice. First version stereo, second version mono (any audio editor will do this easily).
Now stand ANYWHERE in your living room, and switch between the two versions. To get the BEST stereo effect, yes, you should sit, stand, dance, whatever, at a point in an equatorial triangle between the speakers. But standing almost anywhere else in the room, short of right next to one of the speakers, you WILL hear a difference between mono and stereo.
The idea that unless you stand in that one 'sweet spot' you won't hear it at all is simply ridiculous... No one is arguing there is no difference. Of course there a difference. Different sound is arriving to the ear at different times. Theres the perceptible difference... The argument is whether the difference is better in a live venue. There is a reason professional engineers and Producers mix and master in the "sweet spot" and would never ever think of doing it off axis. I think you were right the first time. if one personally needs all the bells and whistles and stereo etc to feel good about their performance then they are doing the right thing. For them. To state others are delivering substandard performance because they don't believe stereo is all that and the benefits of a wide consistent area of sonic bliss is a better choice for themselves than a stereo sound field. Others feel just as relevant and especially do not feel they are lowering their "standards" performing with a Bose System in mono......quite the contrary in fact. We actually believe the ENTIRE audience is getting a better sonic experience then we had with the Mackie/JBL MR15 System in Stereo. Not just those in the front and center. Everyone hears exactly the same mix as we do with the Bose System. No hot spots, or harsh spots. [This message has been edited by Kingfrog (edited 02-20-2009).]
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros 4 Yamaha Motif XS8 Roland RD700 Casio PX-330 Martin DC Aura Breedlove ATlas Solo Bose MOD II PA
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257131 - 02/20/09 09:17 PM
Re: Tyros3 connected to L1 : Amazing!!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/24/08
Posts: 1099
Loc: Myrtle beach SC
|
Originally posted by hellboy44: Kla4, congrats on your future purchase.
Let me offer two things.
1. The inherent problem with Stereo sounds Summed to Mono have been much discussed, but especially in regard to Yamaha Keyboards as they seem to have an inordinate number of Stereo patches, (let's leave it at that) so I believe you have to be particularly careful with many sounds on those boards, when using any Mono PA.
2. Buy whatever you like, and stick with what pleases you, but if it were me, I would buy one Model II as the dispersion, weight, and performance with Stereo to Mono (especially if you use the Bose T1 mixer with it's many great sounding presets) will be better and give you more options when using a Yamaha Board then a Model 1.
Go back and re-read Gary's post, I was about to say something similar myself, (and have done in other threads) but he beat me to it.
Diki, I rarely reply to you these days because you have proved yourself to me to be an overtly aggressive (and passively aggressive) windbag with long ass posts that have been commented upon negatively (at one time or another) by many Synthzone members - including the owner of this site.
I will say this however.
Gary's post was perfectly reasonable, (and what's more you know it) and quite apart from the content of your usual, know-it-all reply, (I mean, you invented music...right?) I think it was just damn rude. I agree However if you are going to go with the Bose in mono get the Model II WITH the Tone Natch.IF you want stereo the Mod I will be fine. One of the Casino Boats here uses TWO model I systems outside on the water and have been since last Summer with no ill effect. We will never to go back to a conventional system ......speaker poles, cable runs, xovers, big box Subwoofers. monitoring systems,large heavy boxes with 12" or 15" drivers,hand carts...A truck... I will also bet your system gets some positive conversational attention by members of the audience, [This message has been edited by Kingfrog (edited 02-20-2009).]
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros 4 Yamaha Motif XS8 Roland RD700 Casio PX-330 Martin DC Aura Breedlove ATlas Solo Bose MOD II PA
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257133 - 02/21/09 09:02 AM
Re: Tyros3 connected to L1 : Amazing!!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/24/08
Posts: 1099
Loc: Myrtle beach SC
|
Originally posted by hellboy44: Kla4, congrats on your future purchase.
Let me offer two things.
1. The inherent problem with Stereo sounds Summed to Mono have been much discussed, but especially in regard to Yamaha Keyboards as they seem to have an inordinate number of Stereo patches, (let's leave it at that) so I believe you have to be particularly careful with many sounds on those boards, when using any Mono PA.
2. Buy whatever you like, and stick with what pleases you, but if it were me, I would buy one Model II as the dispersion, weight, and performance with Stereo to Mono (especially if you use the Bose T1 mixer with it's many great sounding presets) will be better and give you more options when using a Yamaha Board then a Model 1.
Go back and re-read Gary's post, I was about to say something similar myself, (and have done in other threads) but he beat me to it.
Diki, I rarely reply to you these days because you have proved yourself to me to be an overtly aggressive (and passively aggressive) windbag with long ass posts that have been commented upon negatively (at one time or another) by many Synthzone members - including the owner of this site.
The "issue" with the Yamaha and mono is way over exaggerated. The benefits of an even nearly 180 degree wide dispersion of crystal clear sound far out weigh any supposed sonic deficiencies of the summing of a stereo output. Not to mention a CENTER, ARTIST FOCUSED sound source. Another issue I have with OMBs and Stereo is I believe it further separates the player from the music source. If one is hearing separate parts from widely spaced speakers it tends to become more "karaoke like" where Stereo mixes are routinely played. Mono always appears to come from the center where the musician actually is. Thats why the Bose Pole placed just behind the artist is effective at focusing the attention TO the artist and not a "drum set 20 feet wide, or a guitar lead seemingly coming from ten feet right of the Artist and a sax "player" ten feet to the left left" With that kind of disconnect, People will surely will ask "if there is a certain song in that thing" LOL [This message has been edited by Kingfrog (edited 02-21-2009).]
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros 4 Yamaha Motif XS8 Roland RD700 Casio PX-330 Martin DC Aura Breedlove ATlas Solo Bose MOD II PA
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257134 - 02/21/09 01:40 PM
Re: Tyros3 connected to L1 : Amazing!!
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
OK, back OT.... (or what the topic has morphed into ) Personally, I don't use stereo to present an overly wide image to the audience. I keep most everything panned up the center, and only wide pan things that are doubled. I usually pan my drums back towards center, so you DON'T get the '40 foot wide drummer' syndrome. But one thing I think that really improves with the width is the effects. The reverbs and choruses sound great spread as wide as they can (while the main sound is still fairly centered). And wide spread synth sounds. The spread on these can make a Pink Floyd tune HUGE! And this is apparent pretty much anywhere in the room, other than with your ear stuck in one of the stacks. Not that I use stacks, anyway! A couple of 12" JBL SR's on poles and a sub, and a duo act usually mean that the speaker system is closer than most band PA's. I might go further apart this year, after buying a pair of Mackie SRM150's as stage monitors (they mount on the mike stands), but I'll have to see if having them spread wider helps or hurts... I play outdoors quite a bit, so having a certain amount of realistic space around the instruments and vocals is needed when you don't have any room ambiance to deal with... I am still not sure what the storm in the teacup is all about. Let's face it. What's the difference between a mono PA and a stereo one? ONE MORE SPEAKER. That's it. Not exactly a ground shattering, back breaking addition. Oh, unless you have a Bose PAS, where the additional speaker turns into almost an entire second PA, with multiple parts, bases, subs, (and an almost doubling of price) whatever... Maybe this, and not the sonic difference between mono and stereo is what is REALLY turns PAS users off stereo?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|