Well, Fran, from watching most of the demo video's, I definitely see a LOT more button pushing than playing compared to anything else out there...
Personally, with a touch screen, I prefer far fewer buttons on the panel, basically only those you need to play. I just don't know, at a glance (all you have time for, live), how much information you could glean from over FIFTY LED buttons... and that's just the LEFT side of the MS...
Just how much of that is realtime function control? Because, I don't know about you, but if I need to learn fifty buttons just on my left side to control an arranger, something is seriously out of whack!
There is such a thing as informational overload... and the MS has it in spades! Look at all those other arrangers. Look at your G70. Then look at the MS... How come everybody else manages the task with FAR fewer buttons? Because they are designed by people that actually PLAY music. Not write code - we've already heard how abysmal Dom's choice of demo-ers are - stands to reason he must play worse than them
I just don't see how any real player would think that that kind of informational overload is any real use, live...
Touch screens allow you to bury non-realtime functions away from view in a live situation, and allow you to place controls where they are easy to get to, easy to see, and easy to activate in the heat of performance. The more buttons clustered close together, the greater the risk of hitting the wrong one...
And, from watching those MS demos, I haven't YET seen any performance videos where the performer looked comfortable selecting what they needed. I know it would scare me, and I'm a button junkie.
Sometimes, you CAN have too much of a good thing...