Originally posted by Irishacts:
From what I gather the focus doesn't seem to be on Arranger Functions because of the fact that he will be playing with a drummer and guitarist. It's more about the rhythmic pads, soundscapes, the sequencer and the option to be able to run patterns if need be.
Sorry, but I don't see that information anywhere in his post. He simply asked if it worked like an arranger, and whether you could use it for church. I would be willing to bet that the majority of arrangers used in churches are being used as full arrangers...
But seriously, you know the Oasys well... would you HONESTLY recommend it for a church gig..? You know what kind of players they usually have, and the kind of preparation time they (seldom!) get. You know what and how many GE's you get that you would honestly use in a church?
And you know the kind of learning curve required to master this beast? I just took a look at the GE list of the Oasys. You would seriously put this in front of an average church keyboard player, and expect him to make sense of it?
Now, no offense to Machetero... he may indeed be a VERY highly skilled, highly technical keyboard player. But maybe he isn't (and maybe anybody else playing at the church isn't, either)... Is the Oasys STILL what you would recommend under the circumstances?
You wouldn't recommend an MS to someone that wasn't EXTREMELY technical, and capable of creating their own styles from scratch, You wouldn't recommend a Neko to someone that knew little about computers or VSTis, especially to do a church gig. I think you need to get a LOT more information from Machetero before recommending the most expensive solution to his query, James.
I LOVE my G70 (both of them, actually!
). But I don't recommend it to everyone regardless of what they NEED
An M3, M50, even an older Karma might serve him just as well if he wants pulsing pads and evolving soundscapes (and that doesn't sound like much church music I've ever heard!), and save the church a fortune. And THAT'S doing God's work, IMO...