Originally posted by leezone:
i find the above FUNNY as hell
the AUDYA's styles smoke YAMAHA's hands down
unless of course you like you styles sounding thin, metallic, and midilike,
personally i prefer my arranger to sound like a band with real musicians
Now that's strange, Lee...I find
your comments rather inaccurate.
Yamaha styles are compressed, even, and natural sounding, and are preferred by those of us who like a "finished" and high quality sound.
You may prefer the Audya's alleged "live" sound, but maybe you don't play many complex chords...the Audya's necessary workaround using an
audio and
midi mixture of the guitar parts, in order to get around complex chords, might not matter much to you...or may be it would?
Have you actually tried one? Played some complex chords?
I like an arranger that reads
all the chords, and produces a cohesive, even, and detailed sound that seems to be the preference of pros and home users alike....Yamaha fulfills that promise.
So do Roland and Korg.
But to each his own...there will be those who will prefer the Audya's rather curious way of interpreting guitar chords,
With the Tyros3 and PSR-S910, Yamaha has moved ahead even further, with their implementation of a new Guitar Mode in their styles...pretty awesome.
Roland and Korg, also do neat tricks with guitar parts...and, all these instruments, like the Yamaha, are fully working production models....the Audya...mmmm...not so much
Ian
[This message has been edited by ianmcnll (edited 11-25-2009).]