|
|
|
|
|
|
#278382 - 01/04/10 11:07 PM
Re: SZ membership: women vs. men?
|
Member
Registered: 03/04/06
Posts: 533
|
...and the more I think about it, the more I note that most great music was written by men (Broadway: Rogers & Hammerstein, George Gershwin Opera: Guiseppe Verdi, Puccini etc. And even the great bandleaders of the 40's were men.
Also, I don't ever remember seeing a woman in the field nowadays who was there to make great music. As I said they're there mostly for the attention or to simply make money.
I got into music as a kid because I simply "loved music." Couldn't get enough of it....would stay awake every night to listen to Alan Freed right up to midnight. I started playing because I wanted to make great music myself, not because I wanted to make money (although that came with it). In short, my goal was somewhat altruistic. Like Mama Leoni said in her commercials: Make good music and plenty of it....the people will come!
I don't see that desire in women. As was mentioned here, they seem to be wired for other things....and nurturing they are Black Belts at.
At various times throughout my career, I tried auditioning women to form a duo. Nothing ever worked because I found most of them to be in the field for the wrong reason. They're interest was in it, but their heart was NOT. I wanted to do great arrangements and work hard at it, and they just wanted to go out and sing....most of them not even wanting to take the time to go for vocal training.
I even have a lady friend who has a voice that would shatter glass. Julliard trained. Stops people dead in their tracks when she sings. I've tried many a time to talk her into doing a duo on stage. No dice. She's content with just singing in her living room while I back her up on the piano.
Again, I'm not knocking women at all. Just realizing a little more that they do so many things well (aside from giving directions), but they don't seem to have any innate interest in making great music.
Lucky
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#278387 - 01/06/10 10:07 PM
Re: SZ membership: women vs. men?
|
Member
Registered: 03/04/06
Posts: 533
|
Originally posted by Diki: Sorry, Lucky, but that's about the most sexist thing on this thread.
I know several killer female players and singers that are ALL about the music, and probably less about the money and attention than you are...
...where would we be without women like Bonnie Raitt, or Diana Krall, or Aretha Franklin, or Patty Smith, or Bjrk or..... the list goes on and on.
And for an even more extensive list, try this one [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_composers_by_birth_year]http://en.wikipedia.org
There is no such thing as a sexist remark. There are only remarks made that are then LABELED by whoever hears it. That said, I looked at your list of women composers. Diki, your argument doesnt hold water. I didnt see one female composer that I recognized or who wrote songs that would be recognized. Now Im not implying that women are not capable of making great musicsee: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_were_male_composers_more_famous_than_female_composers http://www.abrsm.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=10042 but I am re-stating what I said before: ...and the more I think about it, the more I note that most great music was written by men (Broadway: Rogers & Hammerstein, George Gershwin Opera: Guiseppe Verdi, Puccini etc. And even the great bandleaders of the 40's were men. Be honest, have you ever heard compositions by women that even approximate what Beethoven or Cole Porter wrote. And wrote profusely. Now if you happen to know several killer female players and singers that are ALL about the music that just tells me you KNOW some killer female players and singers. It doesnt tell me there are enough of them to go around in the general music field to win the argument. Bonnie Raitt, or Diana Krall, or Aretha Franklin, or Patty Smith, or Bjrk These are contemporary artists who only came to the forefront relatively recently. Im talking about since time began (or rather music began), men seem to have dominated the field of composing, NOT entertaining (and I won't downplay the contributions of vocalists like Judy Garland, Ella Fitzgerald, Sara Vaughan, Dinah Washington, Doris Day, Kathryn Grayson, the Andrews Sisters and the rest of the great 40s/big band singers. And yes, I do realize that for me it could very well be geographical. I live in an area that praises, covets, and respects only money and what it can buy. Around here, music and musicians take a depressing back seat to what's considered to be the root of all evil. Lucky [This message has been edited by Lucky2Bhere (edited 01-06-2010).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#278390 - 01/07/10 03:24 AM
Re: SZ membership: women vs. men?
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14287
Loc: NW Florida
|
Clara Schumann. Nuff said. Remember, in Beethoven's time, most of the classical and Baroque eras, women weren't ALLOWED (by men) to train and make a living as musicians and composers. Remember, in the time of Shakespeare, men played all the women's roles You see any shortage of good actresses, today? And you can't take my list of contemporary female stars, and diss it, then say you are not discounting Ella, Sarah, Dinah, and all the rest. Those modern female musicians are the logical extension of what came before. On this of all forums, I would tread warily of labeling female musicians just 'in it for the money, or the attention'. Basically, if you CAN play well, you are only playing an arranger for the money or the attention You have the skill to play in a band, but choose to play with a machine for what? For the art of it? Or is it for the money and the attention (no other musicians to grab your limelight, are there)? Finally... "There is no such thing as a sexist remark. There are only remarks made that are then LABELED by whoever hears it." is absurd. Does that mean I can insult the hell out of you, but what I write ISN'T insulting, until you label it so...? I don't think so An insult is an insult from the moment it is written, and a sexist remark doesn't need someone else to call it that for it to be one...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|