Haven't heard a word of TRUTH anywhere in this whole thread, boys... Play nice, it's all nothing but OPINION.
Sorry, James, but put tired old Triton samples in your whizbang engine, damn thing doesn't sound an iota better. And DNC - what a joke! At least Yamaha tie their more 'closed' SA2 technology to highly crafted samples to leverage the technology. Where's the CONTENT from Korg to do the same? MIA, old boy...
Korg may have built the engine, but they failed to provide any fuel for it. So there it sits, looking pretty, going nowhere... waiting for the PA3Xpro to actually USE the horsepower.
Bottom,line, as you have found with your V-Machine is that you don't need a state of the art engine anywhere NEAR as much as you need great samples in the first place. And especially for drums, you need virtually NO fancy playback features. You just need great drum samples in the first place, then you need great performances on those samples to drive a style. All of which is MORE than possible without a single change to AWM2.
I've heard amazing performances from the MoXS, basically due to how good its' basic samples are in the first place. And, to be honest, I haven't heard a damn thing from Korg and the M3 that shows any improved degree of realism. Personally, unless you are a sound designer, it boils down to how good the raw, basic samples are in the first place...
What has amazed me is, after all the comments about the basic Yamaha drum sound, they keep trotting out new choir sounds, trombone sounds, things like that which don't affect the basic sound of the instrument. But they make REALLY good drum products, and really good electronic drum products, and by now you would have thought a set of TOTL DTX samples could have made its' way to the Premium content section.
What's the hold-up?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!