|
|
|
|
|
|
#282028 - 02/24/10 03:01 AM
Re: Next AUDYA61 and AUDYA Module... How much memory???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14287
Loc: NW Florida
|
I know you own a Ketron... but amazed you want to play it, if a lack of a GB sized RAM is enough to keep you away from the Audya You enjoy your current Ketron for what it is, rather than what it could be better at. Why not enjoy the Audya for the same reasons..? It's never going to have everything you want. Nothing ever does. But if it beats your current Ketron by quite a bit, why isn't simply that sufficient? I'm sure you didn't hang around when your current Ketron came out going 'it's only got USB1' (if that), or there's no sampler, etc., etc.. You bought it for what it DID... Me, I'd quite like an Audya to take for a spin, but I think I'll wait a couple of years and buy one s/h when the price returns to something closer to reality.. In the meantime, I'm just happy I have an arranger where you don't NEED to load up a decent piano in RAM. The onboard one is quite sufficient for me! Plus an extra 64MB SRX ROM tones that is always instantly available makes more sense to me than a sampler you never, in the heat of gigging, have time to load up. I still think adding a V-Machine or Musebox is the more flexible way of adding sounds, if the arranger's MIDI capabilities are capable of addressing it correctly.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282029 - 02/24/10 04:11 AM
Re: Next AUDYA61 and AUDYA Module... How much memory???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1631
Loc: Ireland
|
Hi Diki. There's nothing wrong with people wanting the same features found in other keyboards added to their own favourite brand. Ketron's strengths are in producing keyboards that have sounds and styles that are both very good. Beyond that they are trailing very far behind when it comes to core features you would expect that would be standard on every keyboard at this stage. This is where the Audya stick out. It's their only premium priced keyboard, but it does not have the features to justify the price when compared to what the competition are doing for far less money. Someone wanting 1GB of RAM in a new and premium priced keyboards is not unreasonable. There are keyboards out there that already have 1GB and are not premium priced keyboards. A proper sampler with a good amount of RAM is a very important thing. You might not realise just how much so because it's probably not important to you, but anyone who has started using Samples would never be able to turn around now and do without them. I still think adding a V-Machine or Musebox is the more flexible way of adding sounds, if the arranger's MIDI capabilities are capable of addressing it correctly. Nothing at all wrong with a V-Machine or Musebox, but the ownership of the problem shouldn't be simply passed onto someone else. There is no substitute to having the sounds inside the keyboard your playing. Cheers James
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282040 - 02/24/10 03:03 PM
Re: Next AUDYA61 and AUDYA Module... How much memory???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14287
Loc: NW Florida
|
The trouble is, once you decide to use the highest quality sounds, the best available samples, the most expressive keyswitching, well, even a GB is paltry. You look at the sizes of some of the better GIGA instruments, just ONE can max that GB out, and still need more!
GIGA, Kontakt, most of the modern VSTi samplers stream from HD, which no modern arranger other than the MS can do. So, in fairness, you are going to be still mired in older sample sets, as all the latest stuff relies on streaming (modern sound designers have just about given up on trying to make samples space efficient). Personally, if I was looking for something right now, I think I would prefer a Muse rather than deal with a built-in sampler, particularly as how relatively barebones the Ketron voice architecture is. Kontact can do a LOT more with the samples than an Audya can...
If, as you say, you are not shooting for live convenience, why not use the tool with the most flexibility?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282046 - 02/24/10 11:08 PM
Re: Next AUDYA61 and AUDYA Module... How much memory???
|
Member
Registered: 07/31/08
Posts: 570
Loc: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
|
oh god here we go again,
where are these rumors comming from re the the module and the other improvements to Audya, where is the official word except AJ's comments about 1 to go with no detail except will knock our socks off, and so on, I mean I've got an SD3 love it to death, and i'm still waiting for futher support on it in the way of more styles and so on, this was out a long long time before Audya was, so i understand the concern over Audya, but have pitty on us SD5/3 owners, looks like your getting yours before us, and thats not making me a happy Ketron owner!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282047 - 02/25/10 02:08 AM
Re: Next AUDYA61 and AUDYA Module... How much memory???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5399
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
Originally posted by Diki: I agree. However, in Wersi's case, it's price prohibitive, and in the MS's case, it's at the cost of a TOTL arranger section. I happen to think that if your primary need for VSTi's is better quality RH sounds, adding a Musebox or V-Machine to an already great sounding, affordable arranger is still your best bet. I would have no argument with that, if arrangers were just for professionals or those with a dedicated room, (Studio) however virtually all arrangers (Particularly TOTL) are sold to home players who normally have partners, and having additional boxes and cable in the lounge (Where most will be situated) is a no no, also if you handed a Muse or V machine to most home players (With the instruction books) all you would get is a blank look, and “I can’t understand that”. Combine it all into a single board however, and they can have top notch sounds and keep their partners happy all at the same time. Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282048 - 02/25/10 07:53 AM
Re: Next AUDYA61 and AUDYA Module... How much memory???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1631
Loc: Ireland
|
Originally posted by Robbo: oh god here we go again,
where are these rumors comming from re the the module and the other improvements to Audya, where is the official word except AJ's comments about 1 to go with no detail except will knock our socks off, and so on, I mean I've got an SD3 love it to death, and i'm still waiting for futher support on it in the way of more styles and so on, this was out a long long time before Audya was, so i understand the concern over Audya, but have pitty on us SD5/3 owners, looks like your getting yours before us, and thats not making me a happy Ketron owner!! If you read the first post in the thread you will see that nobody is spreading rumours. A simple question was asked and everyone is just sharing their opinion on it. Regards James
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282050 - 02/25/10 03:18 PM
Re: Next AUDYA61 and AUDYA Module... How much memory???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14287
Loc: NW Florida
|
I keep trying to explain that the innards of things like the Audya are completely different to a normal computer. I really don't know why some here refuse to acknowledge something they could confirm as easily as opening up their arranger and taking a look. You all make it sound like there's some vast conspiracy to deny you all vast RAM amounts, or the latest greatest peripheral connectivity standards, or high def video out, yada yada yada... The truth is, these things work off of proprietary chips, not the motherboard of some off the shelf computer. I mean, this is bloody obvious, because it's next to impossible to get a modern motherboard WITHOUT USB2, and plenty of RAM addressing. The MS and Wersi are the only arrangers based around normal computer hardware. The rest use RISC chips, dedicated hardware chips, etc., which are cheaper than a full motherboard, but don't get made as fast as technology turns over. They are made in quantity, which assures cheapness, but are expensive to tool up for. Which is why you'll usually find arrangers and other keyboards trailing the tech curve. Look, it's simple. Want multi GB sized RAM, even streaming RAM? Want USB2? Want hi-def video out? Want to play with VSTi's and huge RAM sized samples? Get an MS. The tool you want exists. The trouble is, if you want to be on the bleeding edge, you've got to be prepared to bleed... It seems to me that, if you are willing to make huge sample sets work on an Audya (remember, virtually NO sample set for one sampler comes in to another sampler with all its' associated synth programming intact... you'll have to do ALL the voice programming yourself), you are probably technical enough to make the MS work for you, and it has ALL the modern gewgaws that you are always clamoring for. In the meantime, pay close attention to Robbo's post. This is a point I've made in the past. GB sized RAM amounts and high speed load up are OK, but what's the POINT if you are stuck with an arranger that the factory has made few new styles for in YEARS? If you prioritize your needs in an arranger, let's face it, plenty of new styles, and often, is WAY higher on the list than an increase in the RAM. Things like this, and the inability for the sound engine to stream fast enough to make playing ALL chords in audio possible rank FAR higher on the list of things to worry about, IMO. Past performance is always a good indicator of future efforts, and, no matter what Ketron SAY, I'd be basing my expectations of new styles (and even new features) on what Ketron has done in the past. So don't hold your breath waiting for a boatload of new styles every now and then. Or a GB of RAM
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|