|
|
|
|
|
|
#288548 - 06/01/10 05:19 PM
Re: How Much Does Gear WEIGHT Matter?
|
Member
Registered: 03/12/06
Posts: 845
Loc: Miami FL nov-may/Lakeville CT ...
|
Diki, you've no doubt heard the expression "straw that broke the camel's back?" A measly 5 or 10 lbs? That ain't measly, Diki. Have you ever done progressive weight training? If so, you know that 2 lbs can make a big difference. At some point adding only one lb. will make a lift impossible.
The difference between your G70 and my E60 is 18 lbs. That's huge. (And I wish the E60 were lighter, it kicks my ass at age 71 even without using a case and using the vertical method you describe)
As far as I have heard, there's little difference in the sound quality of the two, so that's no argument. and the E60 is far from unstable on the stand. it does lack the "extras" like mic input, harmonizer, multipedal controller capability, drawbars.. but none of those are essentials to me. I'd like to have them, but not for 18 lbs more.
I'm selling some of my vintage saxes (one went today)that i no longer play. I think I'll take a flyer on the M50, I'm sure the piano sound will be inferior to the E60 but that's not so critical if gives me other advantages, plus it's about 8-9 lbs lighter. I can afford to splurge on the higher-end M3 when i sell another horn, but at 36 lbs, no thanks. The m50 will do just fine.
I use Ev sx-100 spkr(s) and a 20-lb Behringer 5-ch powered mixer. They sound great and they are lightweight. For small rooms I use one little 12-lb Roland cube monitor, and leave the Ev/mixer home. sounds good enough, would sound fuller on my big rig..but I don't care, It sounds good enough, it's my' performance that's more important than my rig. You of all people know this, to hear you talk like a rig-fetishist is crazy.
But i have no objection to you carrying heavier loads if you feel what the heavier equipment offers is well worth the trade-off..just please stop objecting to others making the weight trade-off on the opposite side to your choice, especially when they don't think they are really trading off a lot of quality to gain lighter weight. There is room for both opinions, and both are valid, so please stop giving "permission" to those who are actually feeble but at the same time implying they will sound like crap compared to your rig. And please stop the "in your face" arguments re weight with those of us who are not feeble, but find the weight an important consideration, and nothing "measly" about it, and are not willing to concede that if they went heavier, it would make all that difference in the quality of what they present. Most importantly, as you have agreed with me in the past, great players sound great on any equipment, and lousy players sound lousy. That's not to say everyone shouldn't have the best equipment possible, just that if it's going to stress them out re the weight, it's not that big a deal. The fact you can handle it well means you are in great shape (plus very attached to your G70 for good reasons) but you are not everyone else, and can't always sit in judgment of others..no matter how right you think you are.
------------------ Miami Mo
_________________________
Miami Mo
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#288550 - 06/01/10 06:04 PM
Re: How Much Does Gear WEIGHT Matter?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
|
Originally posted by ianmcnll: I'm not going to argue with you Fran, as I know you love the G-70, and you think it's the best.
That's wonderful, but, I feel the S910 and of course, the incredible Tyros3, have the edge.
That's why I play these instruments...otherwise, I'd be forced to lug around a G-70, and thankfully, I don't have to.
Like you, I feel I have the best sounding arranger, and you won't convince me otherwise.
Ian Ian, I know that......Just look at me as the G70's corner man in a boxing bout.. I can't think of a "bad" arranger in today's market...some just fit better for different folks... Miami Mo....I really don't have a problem carrying heavier gear...I guess I am use to physical chores.. There is one observation...I notice that I will use a Rock N Roller to haul my G70 and Cube amps.....a pretty easy adventure.. but, when I use say my Prelude (under 20 pounds , but with the case(bag) and the laptop and mixer, etc...it weighs more like 40 pounds..and also the 29 pound BA330...guess what? I find myself carrying the equipment by hand (since they are so much lighter)... ....and I am using more energy hauling my "light" set up.... So really it isn't the equipment weight at all....it is how smart we haul the gear.. Mo, believe me there is a big difference in the sounds between many of the G70/E60 boards...I was fortunate to own both at the same time and A/B'd them extensively...As much as I loved the E60 as an alternative..yet compatible with the G70...Picking the G70 over the E60 is a no brain-er...for me..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#288554 - 06/01/10 08:17 PM
Re: How Much Does Gear WEIGHT Matter?
|
Member
Registered: 03/12/06
Posts: 845
Loc: Miami FL nov-may/Lakeville CT ...
|
Fran, i can't imagine that the E60 sounds I use: ep, bass, piano, jazz organ, vibes, jazz gtr, scat vocals, spanish gtr, and which sound really excellent, will sound so much better on a G70 as to make me play better music or reach my audience any better. not 18 pounds better. maybe you use a ton more sounds and styles(i have very limited need of styles, i only use bass/drum or just bass or just drum) and therefore you find some significant differences. and i don't lift, i use cart for spkrs/head and folding hand truck for kbd, so it's not about smart moving technique. i can't deal with 46 lbs in even a very limited way. call me a wimp, an old fart or whatever--and except for you and Diki, there are few here that opt for more weight just because they might like a certain rig. they opt for less weight and getting as close as possible on the sound etc..because nothing is giving BAD sound today, and it's not the sound quality of the rig that makes the music, so OPTIMUM sound is cool, but it's a marginal utility as they say in economics. You just don't need it to sound good. One iota of playing better is worth 10 iotas of improved rig.
------------------ Miami Mo
[This message has been edited by keysvocalssax (edited 06-01-2010).]
[This message has been edited by keysvocalssax (edited 06-01-2010).]
_________________________
Miami Mo
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#288556 - 06/02/10 04:42 AM
Re: How Much Does Gear WEIGHT Matter?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 2866
Loc: Tampa, FL
|
Then why aren't you toting around a Hammond B3 and a Rhodes? Originally posted by Diki: Weight is always a factor, but unfortunately (at least for me!) it is trumped by SOUND.
My audience do not care one jot what my keyboard weighs. They care what it sounds like. If I choose a lighter keyboard, I am cheating them if it doesn't sound as good. Trust me, guys, I would LOVE a lighter arranger, but until someone makes one [b]significantly lighter (I'm not going to trade around to save a measly five to ten pounds) that makes absolutely NO compromise in the sound or the action, I am unwilling to make the change... Most of us use speakers that each weigh up to twice what our arrangers do. If we are willing to lug THOSE around, why not the one thing that makes the MOST impact on our live sound (the arranger itself)..? All things being equal, of COURSE the lighter gear is the better gear. But things are never equal, are they? [/B]
_________________________
Al
Pa4x - LD Systems Maui 28 - Mackie Thumps
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|