Note all the Real Time Controls, that Arrangers dont have.
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
Originally posted by Irishacts: It sounds very nice, but do we really need another Motif ?
Whatever happened to Yamaha's innovation?
James
The Motif is in the same process as the Tyros.. No innovation, only a lot of small updates every few years that in the end make a (much)better instrument..
History tough has proven that as soon as companies stop being innovative this will be the beginning of the end ...
As i said in another post, i feel sorry for the company that once ruled inovation with products like DX7 and VL-1.
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Roland Jupiter 80, Ipad pro.
Originally posted by Bachus: The Motif is in the same process as the Tyros.. No innovation, only a lot of small updates every few years that in the end make a (much)better instrument..
History tough has proven that as soon as companies stop being innovative this will be the beginning of the end ...
As i said in another post, i feel sorry for the company that once ruled inovation with products like DX7 and VL-1.
LOL No need to feel sorry for Yamaha...They have 47% of the professional workstation market. Korg ruled with the M1 and Triton for a long time and laid an egg with the M3. Roland hasn't had a marque stage unit since the Jupiter days and the D series for a short time. Fantom is the loopers favorite for trance and dance. The Motif X series will be the king of the hill for awhile longer. As well as their Arrangers in the US anyway. Yamaha is a very healthy company. I ride a Yamaha V Star 1300 in whose factory the chromed drum hardware is made.....Yamaha has it going on many fronts. Don't cry for them....LOL
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros 4 Yamaha Motif XS8 Roland RD700 Casio PX-330 Martin DC Aura Breedlove ATlas Solo Bose MOD II PA
Note all the Real Time Controls, that Arrangers dont have.
Hi Abacus Arrangers have more real-time controls when it comes to styles. Workstations have more real-time controls when it comes to sounds. Try not to get the two confused.
[This message has been edited by to the genesys (edited 09-10-2010).]
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5386
Loc: English Riviera, UK
Quote:
Originally posted by to the genesys: Hi Abacus Arrangers have more real-time controls when it comes to styles. Workstations have more real-time controls when it comes to sounds. Try not to get the two confused.
[This message has been edited by to the genesys (edited 09-10-2010).]
I suggest you have another look at the demo, and then have a look at the real time controls on an arranger. (It’s like chalk and cheese, in that arrangers have very few real time arranger or sound controls) Regards
Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
KORG's Pa-Series arrangers have had all that for years. By default they can do volume, Cut Off, Resonance, ADSR and effects direct from the factory on the sliders and outside that you can assign other functions to them.
You can even control an external PC or keyboard direct from the front panel of a KORG Arranger.
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5386
Loc: English Riviera, UK
I suggest you have a look at the video again, and you will see that the assignable sliders on the Korg arrangers pale in comparison to the real time assignable controls on the XF.
I am talking about REAL TIME Assignment of all the ADSR etc. controls, and not having to keep going into menus (Or storing them in a pre-set) every time you need to change a function on a track.
Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
Originally posted by abacus: I suggest you have a look at the video again, and you will see that the assignable sliders on the Korg arrangers pale in comparison to the real time assignable controls on the XF.
I am talking about REAL TIME Assignment of all the ADSR etc. controls, and not having to keep going into menus (Or storing them in a pre-set) every time you need to change a function on a track.
Bill
But that is just real-time control of a sound.
A Korg arranger and any other arranger has better real-time style control over the XF.
I don’t know about the PA 2x pro, but on the XS and probably the XF, each of the 8 knobs have multiple functions.