 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#294753 - 09/27/10 02:45 PM
Re: Pattern sequencer
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14375
Loc: NW Florida
|
It's actually a throwback to the earliest days of sequencing, where, usually for lack of data reasons, ALL sequencers used the 'chunks' system. You made a chunk for the intro, a chunk for the verse, the chorus, the bridge, etc., and then created a playlist that triggered them in the order you wanted.
It's great for electronica, hiphop, trance, all those hypnotic repeating stuff, but was superseded eventually in the software world and then the hardware worlds, by sequencers that had sufficient storage to allow through composed pieces, so the second verse wasn't IDENTICAL to the first, and so on. FAR better for acoustic and played (as opposed to sequenced) types of music.
Bottom line is, most sequencers allow you to copy and paste whole sections of song around, which allows you to do many similar things to pattern mode, but without pattern modes limitations. Albeit, not in realtime, unless you start to use the Markers, which can allow you to realtime the order of your song.
In an arranger, it is very much like switching between styles, while the style is running. You get the same ability to still play the chords, but you get radical (or subtle, or anything in between) changes when you switch.
I think you'll find this ability (or something functionally similar) in just about any modern WS like Fantom, M3, etc..
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#294754 - 09/27/10 10:02 PM
Re: Pattern sequencer
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Originally posted by Diki: It's actually a throwback to the earliest days of sequencing, where, usually for lack of data reasons, ALL sequencers used the 'chunks' system. You made a chunk for the intro, a chunk for the verse, the chorus, the bridge, etc., and then created a playlist that triggered them in the order you wanted.
It's great for electronica, hiphop, trance, all those hypnotic repeating stuff, but was superseded eventually in the software world and then the hardware worlds, by sequencers that had sufficient storage to allow through composed pieces, so the second verse wasn't IDENTICAL to the first, and so on. FAR better for acoustic and played (as opposed to sequenced) types of music.
Bottom line is, most sequencers allow you to copy and paste whole sections of song around, which allows you to do many similar things to pattern mode, but without pattern modes limitations. Albeit, not in realtime, unless you start to use the Markers, which can allow you to realtime the order of your song.
In an arranger, it is very much like switching between styles, while the style is running. You get the same ability to still play the chords, but you get radical (or subtle, or anything in between) changes when you switch.
I think you'll find this ability (or something functionally similar) in just about any modern WS like Fantom, M3, etc.. I know Motif supports this, i know M3 doesn't. For me its a bit like i currently use ableton live. I use there patterns to just jam arround and improvise. Having 12 different blues patterns and switching between them without the need to play chords on the left can be a blessing sometimes, I prefer this above styles in full keyboard mode. There are so many ways to be creative on a keyboard...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|