I don't think anyone can realistically expect EVERY style in any arranger to be ALL good. Especially as what even MAKES a style 'good' varies so radically from player to player.
All one can realistically ask for is CONSISTENCY...
And I definitely hear that with Yamaha styles.
I guess a lot depends on whether you want SOME styles ridiculously better than others, and some styles a bit ho-hum (and hopefully, your taste is to the styles that are the best), or you are prepared that ALL the styles be just a LITTLE ho-hum, with nothing that stands head and shoulders past the rest, but nothing that sucks compared to the rest...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/692e3/692e31920d4f668ee282735f9b564d63e809ba58" alt=""
I have to confess, I'm more into consistency, myself, or at least into nice easy editing tools so that you can achieve that consistency yourself without a boatload of work...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea9c0/ea9c02defd965f87dd0e2dade95d8dceed7992b4" alt=""