|
|
|
|
|
|
#309469 - 01/14/07 08:36 PM
Rhythm machine soft vs OMB & LS
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/09/02
Posts: 3163
Loc: Pensacola, Florida, USA
|
I am getting an idea to check into the soft world, but possibly not using OMB or LS. I'm thinking there must be a rhythm machine soft program where you can pick latin, swing beats etc that will sound maybe even better than what's available using OMB or LS and dealing with their particular issues.
In other words I'm considering checking into doing all the parts live except for the drummer. I already have some midi bass pedals. They are an octave. If this goes the way I want maybe I'd want to get an octave and a half or a two octave pedal board.
This along with mainly the sounds of the Rhodes, B3, Vibes, Accordian, Piano, Guitar and Bass. The demos I've just heard on these instruments have just about blown me away.
I'm getting the notion of having 2 or 3 midi controller keyboards and have it set up more like an organ.
So, I assume there is soft Rhythm machine programs. Could you point me in that direction as I still don't have a good enough vocabulary to do a google search on this and related things.
Best Scott
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#309472 - 01/16/07 06:44 AM
Re: Rhythm machine soft vs OMB & LS
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5386
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
Hi Scott What you are looking for is a drum sequencer, and the best way to find out what’s available is to just type drum sequencer into Google, however be aware that most are designed so as to allow you to make up your own rhythms, rather then supplying ready made patterns. The project you are considering has a steep learning curve and many pitfalls; therefore I would suggest you start off with OMB, which although very basic will give you a good grounding on how to put together a simple setup. Multiple keyboards sound good initially, but due to the spacing required can be awkward to play together. (An organ has the keyboards in close proximity thus making them easy to use) Don’t forget also that Wersi OAS instruments come in all forms, (The Abacus being the most flexible) and all the setup work been done for you, this means that all you will need to do is select what software instruments you wish to install. (Although when you see what the OAS software is capable of on its own, you will most likely find that you will not have to add many software instruments or samples to get what you want) The downside is the initial cost, however as you never need to change the instrument, (You upgrade the software) in the long term it becomes a very cheap option. Hope this helps
Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#309475 - 01/21/07 05:34 PM
Re: Rhythm machine soft vs OMB & LS
|
Member
Registered: 08/30/05
Posts: 36
Loc: Kingscliff, NSW, Australia
|
Scott,
Try Steinberg's Groove Agent 3. Pros include: 25 variations per 'style', 25 fills per 'style', auto fill function, 1/2 time function, tweakable 'humanize function' (quantization), variations can be selected via midi keyboard, built-in percussionist module which will play in sync with the main drum module etc...
Cons include: Only built-in 'styles' (I think), not a lot of styles in each genre, cost etc...
I am sure at some stage in the future Groove Agent (or similar) will become the heart of my arranger system.
Kind regards, Mark
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|