Why does the fact that these companies must have to guard their research have to equate to *dishonesty*?
I doubt that has much if anything to do with it.
And I'm sure these companies *do* have some users, both pro and amateur, among their researcha and development resources, it is just that they do not put the thing out there for any and all to get into the act, which may or may not be a good thing for the company's overall health or at least may not be a part of their chosen business model.
For one thing, there is likely to be a certain modicum of secrecy involved with this type of thing, one company may not want to let what they view to be their competition have a look at whatever upcoming release may have that could let the other company "scoop" a certain feature or feature set that the former may have spent quite a lot in resources to initially develop. That kind of corporate security only makes sense.
We now return you to whatever pet conspiracy theories float yer boat...
--Mac
_________________________
"Keep listening. Never become so self-important that you can't listen to other players. Live cleanly....Do right....You can improve as a player by improving as a person. It's a duty we owe to ourselves." --John Coltrane
"You don't know what you like, you like what you know. In order to know what you like, you have to know everything." --Branford Marsalis