|
|
|
|
|
|
#336168 - 01/14/12 09:29 AM
Re: Difference between MicroArranger/PA50 & PA500
[Re: Scott Langholff]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
Scott,
The microArranger is based on the PA-50SD which was introduced back in 2004, so all functions and features should be the same except for some new styles (maybe) and perhaps some internal tweaks.
I was wondering what the difference would be in price between the adult sized PA-50SD and the little baby MicoArranger?
I was thinking of the latter's use as a module controlled by a Yamaha P-95 or even the Tyros4, but the size is big enough to warrant using a double stand in either scenario. Kind of defeats the module idea, at least for me.
I would also think that with the advent of the wee Korg, the PA-50SD may be available at a reduced and attractive price, allowing both the acquisition of Korgian arranger styles and sounds with a normal sized, and much easier to play, keyboard (also with speakers, no less).
Are you planning on using a microArrnger as an addition, or like some others, using it as a roving, ultra portable entertainment system?
Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336172 - 01/14/12 09:56 AM
Re: Difference between MicroArranger/PA50 & PA500
[Re: Scott Langholff]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336186 - 01/14/12 02:33 PM
Re: Difference between MicroArranger/PA50 & PA500
[Re: ianmcnll]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/09/02
Posts: 3163
Loc: Pensacola, Florida, USA
|
Hi Ian
I guess I have an interest in the micro for the same reasons everyone else is having, it's small, light, cheap, a new toy. You get some Korg sounds and styles to add to your existing keyboard and/or use instead of. I think the newness and novelty has touched the kid emotions in us.
I'm actually, wondering why I'm interested though, even with the above, as I had a PA60 in my home for 10 days free trial from a local music store. They where going to sell it to me for their cost which I could verify as I was in music retail for over 30 years. I had the Tyros at the time, try as I might I didn't like the PA60 by far compared to the Tyros. I really wanted to like it, but it just didn't cut the buck. Everyone else who I did an A/B comparision didn't care for it either.
So, why am I thinking about the micro now? Maybe because I already know it will "different" than the T4, and I'm not being as knit picky about it.
The only way I would use the micro or 50, or 500 is if I picked out 10 to 20 generic styles that would work for all my songs, as I certainly would not want to set up both a Korg and a T4.
I do have a hunch that after all the fuss is over, there are going to be a lot of used micros for sale or stuffed in the closet. Maybe I should just wait til I can get one for $200 as I don't expect they will hold much of a value, IMHO.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|