|
|
|
|
|
|
#356213 - 12/09/12 02:17 PM
Re: PA600 KMA Comparison
[Re: hammer]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1162
Loc: Oradea, RO
|
Hi Deane,
Yes, they are stereo , but right and left are perfectly identical. So, they were recorded stereo, but somehow the input must've messed with the signal. It could be either an error when inserting the jack plug into the headphones output, but because it is the same with the both keyboard, probably it is a faulty jack connection or cable maybe... Or maybe the small jack did not went all the way into your H2 recorder...
But I think it is an interesting exercise this. Listening to what you did, indeed the differences are rather subtle and made me think. So, please do this in stereo if possible, so we really can compare...
Thanks, Adi
_________________________
Yamaha S770, Studio One 3, EMU 0404USB, ESI, ATH, Dell. And others.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#356283 - 12/10/12 09:11 AM
Re: PA600 KMA Comparison
[Re: hammer]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/28/01
Posts: 2785
Loc: Lehigh Valley, Pa.
|
Deane,
To me, the KMA sounded "richer, and clearer" and had a more 'crisp, sharp' sound. Seems like the KMA (or the recording setup) had more mid and high tone amplification. The 600 had more of a flat, muffled sound.
Were they both "out of the box" recordings with no other resources, and were the EQ settings the same? The 600 sounded a bit like a PSR-3000 default flat EQ setting. (Not very good)
Bottom line, based on what I heard through my 3.1 HK computer speakers, overall, the KMA sounded better. There must be a way to setup the 600 to sound as good or better than the KMA.
_________________________
Larry "Hawk"
♫ 🎹🎹 ♫ SX-900
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|