|
|
|
|
|
|
#378471 - 12/17/13 12:34 PM
Re: Kids dont want arrangers for todays music...
[Re: Dnj]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14285
Loc: NW Florida
|
Thing is, none of these things offer the operational ease and instant gratification that arrangers offer.
The problem seems to come from the CONTENT of most arrangers made today, along with not just the feature set. Not only do they struggle with not having a proper modern arpeggiator, audio looper, and full synth parameter control from knobs and sliders, but the poor little dearies have to THEN wade past a style selection primarily geared towards their grandparents!
After all, when you bought your first arranger, how would you have felt if most of the content was for music virtually 100 years old?! Hardly anything newer than a Quadrille, or a Mazurka, or a Schottische, Valse à Deux Temps, Redowa, Five-Step Waltz and Varsouvienne! None of the styles to play rock and roll, R&B or cool jazz...
You would have avoided it like the plague, even if, buried under all that was the BEST way to make music easily.
Until someone steps up and combines the features and sounds that kids NEED with the styles they actually LISTEN to, and want to play, the arranger is a non-starter.
For the want of a nail.
Even THEIR music has intros, Variations, fills, breaks and endings. It's just that they are radically different to what is in most arrangers. Get the content and features right though, things like the Yamaha MX series don't stand a chance!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#378519 - 12/17/13 10:15 PM
Re: Kids dont want arrangers for todays music...
[Re: Dnj]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14285
Loc: NW Florida
|
The modern WS still has a few steps to go through before they approach the operational ease and flexibility of arrangers. They ARE getting there, but only about halfway, IMO.
The main thing is, while you can have all the chord following and multiple patterns to allow you to play different sections of a song, there are still considerable difficulties in making them flow into each other.
For instance, in a WS, you want a fill suddenly, you HAVE to ask for it a bar in advance. Ask for it on beat 2, and unlike an arranger, which will immediately jump into the fill, starting on beat 2, nothing will happen until the NEXT bar, when it will then play the ENTIRE fill.
And there is no such thing as an auto-fill. In other words, ask the WS to go from Arp 1 to Arp 2, it will switch at the end of the bar that you asked it to do so to the next pattern. But it won't jump immediately to the fill and THEN go to the next pattern. Everything HAS to be cued up in advance, and everything needs to run through the entire length of its pattern before you can have another pattern start.
So, for instance, you can't set one pattern to be the intro, set that it only plays once, and automatically go to whatever pattern is the equivalent of Variation 1. In other words, you can't give patterns destinations.
Then there's the issue of inversions. WS's, on the whole, may recognize what chord you are playing (although their chord recognition algorithms are far less sophisticated than arrangers), but change inversion, they rarely follow that. Nor are they capable of recognizing what chord TYPE you are playing (maj/min/7th, etc.) and substitute different patterns for those. Everything needs cue-ing by hand, and everything a bar in advance.
But listen to most kids music (if you can!). The real thing still has Intros, fills and Variations, Breaks and endings, and far more variety than is easily performed LIVE with a modern WS.
That is our foot in the door.
But before the kids embrace the arranger paradigm, first it needs stripping of EVERYTHING that could possibly link it to us! ALL the old styles have got to go. All the nomenclature that would even remind them that they are playing their grandparents' arranger needs to go. The cheap speakers need to go (they wouldn't handle a sub-bass even if they were on!). They need maybe a dozen more knobs adding, so they can twiddle the filter cutoff or LFO speed as they play.
Then they need easy incorporation of user audio loops (BK-9 has that nailed!), and all front panel controls need to be able to be sent as USB MIDI to whatever VSTi rig they are running on their laptop...
It would sell like hotcakes, but only if they don't KNOW they are playing an arranger!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#378596 - 12/18/13 12:28 PM
Re: Kids dont want arrangers for todays music...
[Re: travlin'easy]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/08/00
Posts: 4715
Loc: West Virginia
|
Gary.., I mean no disrespect my friend, but you couldn't be farther from the truth on this issue. It's not your fault because you don't play modern music, and as such honestly don't really know what an individual needs the keyboard to be capable of.
I'll give you an excellent example. I have recently attempted to create a modern style of music on my PSR-S700. The S-700 is a MOTL arranger keyboard that (price wise) was right next to the workstation MOTL models (that were priced the same).
Not only do current arrangers lack the sounds and (just as important) the styles to create modern music, but some MOTL arrangers (such as my S-700) are lacking MAJOR abilities that are CRUCIAL to creating modern music, and without them makes an arranger very DIFFICULT to use for these styles. Also.., not to forget the absence of "ASSIGNABLE" REAL TIME CONTROL KNOBS on many models.
Unless it's hidden deep within a menu somewhere that I've not found.., my S-700 (and I would assume MANY others in the S series) lack the ability to SYNC a tones LFO settings to the internal midi clock.., AND more shocking the inability to SYNC some specific EFFECTS settings to the midi clock. It doesn't stop there either. Another HUGE omission you'll find when creating user styles (at least on the Yamaha's) is the mod wheel CANNOT be used to adjust crucial parameters within style parts and RECORDED to that style part.
For example.., if I was to create a Dubstep style, I would need the ability to not only modulate the sound with the wheel, BUT the ability to perform other functions at the same time such as:
-Using the mod wheel to control the LFO rate of the selected tone. -Using the mod wheel to open the filter -Using the mod wheel to control the LFO rate of the chosen effect. -Using the mod wheel to control DSP depth for distortion.
These are just a few things that are CRUCIAL not only to Dubstep, but to MANY styles of electronica. Sure I can make these settings when playing a sound in REAL TIME.., but the purpose of the Style Recording is also to SIMPLIFY song creation. Without the functions I mentioned above means that the user has no choice but to MANUALLY play each of the parts through the duration of the song. There's nothing simplistic about that, and it's an EXTREMELY time consuming process.
Now.., I haven't had the chance to really dig into a Korg arrangers style recording functions.., but if there was ANY arranger on the market that I would "assume" had these abilities.., it would be Korg (who IMO have the BEST combination of a synth/workstation/arranger on the market today).
_________________________
GEAR: Yamaha MOXF-6, Casio MZX-500, Roland Juno-Di, M-Audio Venom, Roland RS-70, Yamaha PSR S700, M-Audio Axiom Pro-61 (Midi Controller). SOFTWARE: Mixcraft-7, PowerTracks Pro Audio 2013, Beat Thang Virtual, Dimension Le.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|