https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmkVFRI70dg

Your thoughts ....

Young man, it appears that you are still hard at work and doing great things.

Good luck,

Gary

Or you just use it with Varranger2...

Thanks Gary ... listened to the market and so using the SD 1000, showed how a song of today can easily be produced with it.

Definately Bachus - the SD 1000 combined with Varranger2, the possibilities are endless!

Well done AJ.

If you can register on my forum, you can see a picture of what can be done with the SD1000 FX DSP

http://www.varranger.com/vforum/index.php/topic,999.msg16906.html#msg16906

Sounds fine for a contemporary style. However, that incessant, non-stop bass drum wouldn’t fit into any of my dinner sets with mostly senior citizens, many of whom wear hearing aids. Even with what I do, I’m often asked to reduce the volume a little. I guess “modern” music and dinner/cocktail music each have their respective places with arranger keyboards.

I am not really sure what this is showing. Pretty much any arranger can be used for modern music if all you are simply doing is sequencing as seems to have been the case in the clip above . Or am I missing something?

Well, if you want to make real good sounding trance or other dance music... Most arrangers and modules really lack the fat sounds to create the beats that the youth wants to hear..

Same goes for this module, it really lacks the power and sounds to make some trance...

I wonder if there would be "true fatometer" to simply show fat % in a sound. E.g. "Bass N14, 43.2% fat". All arguments would be trivial then. If impossible with absolute level of fat meter hardware, than at least provide double blind experiment to compare fatness of all these available sound source options. Otherwise this is endless fatty holywar.

My five and seven year old grand daughters would be singing along at the top of their lungs on that song.