Truly a case of 'different strokes for different folks'. I can't think of any musical scenario where I'd find that useful. Now maybe it's just a cultural thing or just a basic difference in our musical preferences, but I can't even think of a venue that I'd (me, chas) be playing at where the music in THAT video would 'fill the dance floor'. To my ears (and I speak for myself ONLY), that music sounds more 'arranger-ish' than ever because of the repetitive nature of most of it's rhythm components. I say this as one who is not into so-called 'dance music', especially types such as 'Trance', etc. But that's just me, I'm sure there are others that feel entirely different. Like I said, 'different strokes....'.
chas
PS: Just wanted to make it clear that my comments were directed at MARK'S video. However, for the record, I was not impressed with John's video either, and for the same reason, too 'arranger-ish'. I think it's imperative to find a way to make the accompaniment part be more 'passive' and not dominate the performance. If you're very aware of the accompaniment in a performance, you're doing something wrong. YOU, not the accompanient, should be the focus of the performance. Strong vocals and/or a strong right hand, along with a little creativity in 'juice-ing up' (augmenting) the arrangement helps a lot diminishing the 'arranger' effect. A couple of people here, DonM is a good example, do this very well. Again, JMO.
Edited by cgiles (02/28/18 06:24 AM)
_________________________
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." [Nietzsche]