I think the c2d will see an update next year...
I prefer the crumar mojo over the c2d..
I have a C2D (and a C1) and a KeyB. The KeyB is far more authentic. The Mojo sounds ok but is PC based and the control surface isn't as close to a real B3 as the KeyB. Also, the C2D costs as much as a Legend and IMO there is no comparison. The C2D needs a sound engine upgrade.
chas
The b3 on the mojo runs on a dsp board..
Altough there is also a pc version of the b3 engine.. but thats not the one in the mojo..
The same b3 is in my Gemini module, altough i cant compare it to the KeyB..
i did compare it to my kronos, the montage and a Nord stage...
And the GSI/Crumar B3 is by far the one i like most..
Over on the musicians forum at keyboard corner, people are comtinously in twist which one is better... the mojo or the KeyB... from which we can asume that both instruments are leading the pact..newer mojo’s also have a new keybed thats tweaked to feel exactly like the hammonds, which seems to be of some impact..also the mojo sound gets comtinous updates..
As said, i can’t comment on the Keyb, as i have no personal experience on it..
But when did you last try the Mojo, before or after the latest updates?
Seems you can’t go wrong with either these days..
They are leading the pact before Nord amd Hammond itselves where it comes to B3 clones...
What the Nord (and my gemini) have to offer tough, is more physical models, like church organ and farfisa.. but i don’t think that is important to a B3 purist...