A/D converters... that has always been a hot debate if it still plays a role at all or not. Some say all current converters are so good that you don‘t hear a difference. He mentions that the Montage has more insertion effect capabilities. I suspect this is more likely to be responsible for some layered sounds sounding fuller on Montage. It wouldn‘t be a reason for me to prefer the Montage. The Integra has very bad reverb, the MoXF had a much better one. If the MODX effects are on the MoXF level, I‘ll have nothing to complain about.
A/D converters... that has always been a hot debate if it still plays a role at all or not. Some say all current converters are so good that you don‘t hear a difference. He mentions that the Montage has more insertion effect capabilities. I suspect this is more likely to be responsible for some layered sounds sounding fuller on Montage. It wouldn‘t be a reason for me to prefer the Montage. The Integra has very bad reverb, the MoXF had a much better one. If the MODX effects are on the MoXF level, I‘ll have nothing to complain about.
The moxf effects are on Montage level, namely exactly the same..
The differences in dsp power is the number of simultanous effects
Montage 34 inser dsp, or 16 channels+ a/d input
modx 26 insert dsp, or 12 channels + a/d input
The sounds sounding fuller on the montage is probably because of internal settings..
Probably having different settings for master eq and reverb..
As the instruments insides are exactly the same..
The Montage only has a little but more of the same, but not much..
According to Blake edwards and Mister Mister Phil, there is no difference..
Just visit Yamaha’s synth forum, and see what they have to say...