|
|
|
|
|
|
#500601 - 09/10/20 12:51 PM
Re: Pomp and Circumstance
[Re: Terrysutt]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14268
Loc: NW Florida
|
Most of those old commercial SMF’s only use the Capital GM/GS sounds, which, to be frank, are seldom the best in the keyboard. You often find better sounds in the Variations. This is for compatibility, but it’s maybe a good idea if you work on the Makeup Tools to improve one orchestral piece, write down which variation sounds you use to replace the base sounds, and use them on the next piece as a jumping off point...
Don’t forget as well, on the E80 you had an insert MFX available for an SMF, and this might be a good place to send certain orchestral sections that sit at the rear of the orchestra into a different reverb with a slightly larger size (it would also have been nice to put the church organ into it) to give it that more distant sound. This works well with French Horns and trombones and percussion.
And overall, the general reverb from the regular send effects sounds like it could have done with turning up a hair, if you want that Royal Albert Hall sound!
I have to say, I hated the church organ sound, that really needs one of the better variations dialed in!
And don’t miss out on the additional per Part EQ option that was never used by those commercial SMF’s. The vast majority of SMF’s were set up for a basic Sound Canvas at best, so there’s a TON of simple ways to improve them.
Roland’s Makeup Tools has an incredibly useful per-sound velocity offset, where you can easily add or subtract an overall value, so if you find yourself using sounds that have a velocity cross-split, you can dial up or down the velocity of a sound until the split happens musically (and then correct using the Volume offset to compensate for it being louder or quieter). Wonderful for strings which get more marcato as they get louder, French horns which get more strident in the fortissimo passages, or for any orchestral percussion that uses soft and loud samples. Don’t forget, on the Drum Part, each individual sound within the kit can have separate velocity, volume, effects and EQ offsets...
And all are EASILY adjusted. If there’s one thing that Roland’s always had it in spades over their rivals, it’s that Makeup Tools section. When you make it so simple to adjust the sounds, effects and dynamics of a style or SMF, there’s far less excuse for not using it! I’ve often had to do the same kind of editing on Korg’s and Yamaha’s, and I can get the job done better in a tenth of the time using the Roland Makeup Tools!
Try a few of these tricks out, Terry, and see if that sequence can’t be transformed! 😎
Edited by Diki (09/10/20 12:55 PM)
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#500635 - 09/12/20 10:05 AM
Re: Pomp and Circumstance
[Re: Terrysutt]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14268
Loc: NW Florida
|
Because of the shift away from MIDI towards audio stuff nowadays, there is very little in the way of new SMF content optimized for modern keyboards. It’s unlikely that anything you can find is set up with the best Tones modern arrangers have. I’d be willing to bet I don’t have a single SMF made for anything more recent than an SC-88 Canvas module, and probably 99% are for basic Sound Canvas...
Styles, not so much. Arranger manufacturers always make sure that their newest styles fully use the newest Tones and Kits, so it’s always an uphill battle comparing styles and commercial SMF’s because the sequence uses the legacy sounds, not the latest.
My previous post might be a bit much to digest in one go, but approach it one sector at a time. Firstly, change the sounds. Start with the strings, the backbone of any orchestra. If the sequence has separate tracks for violins, cellos and basses, so much the better. If just one strings track, just play the sequence in Makeup Tools and select the string track, then start listening as you change to other string section sounds. The best one will usually jump out at you.
After that (and saving it as a different file, so you can compare to the original as you go along), maybe work on the brass, etc..
You’d be amazed at how quickly it goes, once you get the basic workflow. If you use sequences to play with, the dividends are enormous, and a backing track that sounds dated and flat can become as good as anything your latest styles can do. Some of the people making those old SMF’s were very talented players, they just were working with very dated equipment and sounds. Play the same sequences through the better sounds and they can really come alive!
Maybe after learning the workflow for simply replacing sounds, you can then move on to adjusting their volumes or effects etc., but it all STARTS with replacing the old sounds with the new...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|