|
|
|
|
|
|
#91520 - 01/29/06 06:48 AM
An interesting observation...
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Last night was almost like a trip back in time. My wife and I met up with lots of old friends, indivuduals we hadn't seen in two or more decades, plus some new friends as well. After a great dinner at Silver Spring Mining Company, we adjuourned to a nearby American Legion for a night on the town. There was a five-piece band playing on stage, which consisted of a drummer, sax player, keyboard player, and two vocalists (male and female). One of the OMB performers who was in our group said "You can really hear the difference when you have a live drummer! This group really rocks." Well, I thought about this for a while and came to the following conclusions: Yep, the drummer was great, his timing was outstanding and he really knew his stuff. However, the drums completely drowned out the keyboard and essentially overpowered everything else. Yep, they were really up front and loud. The keyboard player, who is an excellent OMB performer as well, was essentially playing a piano, strings, guitar, and some left hand bass. If anything, he was backing up the drummer with complementary sounds. The sax player was outstanding as well, and fortunately, there was a mic dedicated to the sax. Therefore, when he was playing solo runs, the drummer kept his parts at a low level so the sax was out in front. The same held true when the singers were performing--the drums were somewhat dubdued. While the group put on a good show, the smoke-filled dancefloor was never packed to capacity. Sure, there were a few times when it seemed to fill up, but it was rare to see more than one to three couples on the dancefloor. I sincerely believe that most OMB performers that deal with dance crowds would have packed the dancefloor to capacity. Additionally, the overall sound quality would have been much better balanced. Finally, most Americal Legions pay about $150 to $200 for a 4-hour gig, which was split between 5 performers who had to endure a dense fog of cigarette smoke and a few drunks. At the end of the night we all headed home, tired, smelling like cigarette smoke and ready for a hot shower before hitting the sack. Kinda' reminds me of the way things were more than 40 years ago when I was a you kid and just getting into the entertainment biz--same pay scale, same drunks and same smoke-filled bar-rooms. Some things never seem to change! Cheers, Gary ------------------ Travlin' Easy
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91522 - 01/29/06 09:01 AM
Re: An interesting observation...
|
Member
Registered: 06/24/05
Posts: 892
Loc: Baltimore, MD USA
|
Hi Gary, I have to agree with you whole heartedly on this one. Way back before arrangers, I used to look forward to playing with the band because it was fun and I didn't have to work as hard. But after arrangers came around, the game changed. For smaller bands, 3 or 4 pieces, There's just a whole lot more versatility and sound with a OMB. I can have as many as 8 parts on an arranger. If I go to a traditional trio, piano, bass, and drums, it works fine in jazz. But to play for dancing, it leaves a lot to be desired. These days when I absolutely have to have a group, I build it around the arranger by adding a guitar, sax, and trumpet. The music stays tight all night and even the musicians are happier. Now there's still a lot to be said for an 8 piece show group, well rehearsed, and with lighting, ect., but they usually go for around $2,000. At this stage in my career, I don't need the hassle of keeping this type of group together when I can work as a OMB and make really good money and have lots of fun, and keep the dance floor full. And as for the smoke filled rooms, I've had my fill of those as well. I've just recently turned down a couple of those gigs. I still play the Hyatt, but I just have to walk in, sit down, and play. No epuipment, no dancing, just nice piano music. I'm sure this topic will generate heated discussion on both sides of the fence, this is just my humble opinion at age 55. Salud, Joe ------------------ Songman55 Joe Ayala
_________________________
PSR S950, PSR S900, Roland RD 700, Yamaha C3 6'Grand, Sennheiser E 935 mic, several recording mics including a Neuman U 87, Bose L1 Compact, Roland VS 2480 24 Track Recorder Joe Ayala
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91525 - 01/30/06 03:38 AM
Re: An interesting observation...
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 2866
Loc: Tampa, FL
|
As a drummer and a keyboard player playing in both bands and as a OMB, I can tell you they are vastly different.
In the band on drums, I am constantly being overpowered by guitarists and bass players ripping through their mega amps. They complained to me to hit the drums harder which I will not do. So in their infinite wisdom, they decide to amplify my drums through the main PA system and add sub-woofers to accentuate the bass drum. Now I sound awesome, however they still try to over power me. Guess who loses this competition? The fans. Our music is so loud, that I have had to go out and buy a sound level meter and give it to the club owners so they can measure our volume as to make sure we do not create a bad experience for their guests.
The difference between playing in a OMB and a full band is amazing to me. As a OMB, you must be more creative, fill more empty spaces, provide more backing vocals, and fill-ins, and keep your act fresh. With a band, the very nature of 5 or 6 individuals lends itself to more creative juices feeding off of each other, more vocal variety, etc.
I am in a 5 piece band and we play VFW's and Clubs, but we make a hell of a lot more money than $100-200. We are one of the top bands in our area and command $800-$1500 per night. Weddings are quadruple that.
I could never make that money as a OMB.
Al
_________________________
Al
Pa4x - LD Systems Maui 28 - Mackie Thumps
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91528 - 01/30/06 12:19 PM
Re: An interesting observation...
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/02/04
Posts: 7305
Loc: Lexington, Ky, USA
|
Folks, we're talking about different "animals" here. On the one hand, arrangers and various OMB setups allow for maximum performance by minimum personnel....less hassles (rehersals, disagreements,personal problems)...maximum income (in some cases), etc. But, the trade-off is that hard to describe but delicious unspoken communication between musicians of equal talent, experience and dedication.
I'm never happier than when I'm playing jazz on the: fly"...trading fours...modulations...variations on lead lines, etc. But the trade off, since that only works in jazz (think few and far between, low paying, frustrating venues, far fewer patrons, etc.) is hard on the ego and pocketbook.
Then, there's the show band thing...being locked into entertainment sets...playing most songs exactly the way they are recorded...expensive lights...big sound systems. Personnel changes. Lots of rehersals. Often, you need to be adequate, but not superior in your "chops".
It all comes down to what floats your boat. The guys in Foreplay are extremely succesful for what they're doing, but there are lots of country and rap performers making gobs more money. Even these guys (Foreplay) will tell you that the restrictions on what makes a commercially viable jazz album mean that there are trade offs and creative concessions. In fact, this whole business is a trade off. It's all about what we each need to be fulfilled as performers, musicians..whatever, and what produces the results we require (attention, income, professional development, and more).
The trick is to decide what gets you to where you want to be and DO IT!
Here's hoping that each of you achieves the success you want, however you define it!
Russ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|