please delete post

[This message has been edited by Nick G (edited 04-18-2007).]

Nick perhaps you missed something here. I could give a rats furry backside if you ripped on Roland all day long. The T2 works for you and that's great, but DONT EVER give someone else a hard time because they find reasons as to why it won't work for them, and make a statement that doesn't favor the T2. Roland works for me, but doesn't always work for someone else. So what! As long as you're happy with what you're playing. Don't trash other's because their opinion doesn't sit right along side your own.

UHHH it's no secret I'm a Roland fan, but hmmmm let me scroll back to the top of this post for a second... oh my gosh! What's that...? I'm praising KORG!

Like I said Nick you take things too personal. There was nothing in this post that was attacking anyone. I compared the synth engines in arrangers by the big 3 and pointed out that one had the lead and offered more. It makes me wonder if I had said the T2 was the leader in that area if this topic would have even continued to this point. It's one thing to bust my nads for speculating Nick, but this post addressed FACTUAL difference between the 3.

God almighty, what's wrong with you guys?

I feel like an old man with his pants up to his chest just came outside and yelled "You kids, get off my lawn!"

Fortunately, for everyone to see (at least you haven't slunk in and edited away your posts) are the original posts where Nick and chas come in here and try to rip squeak a new as*hole, just for stating an opinion!

Personally, you can take that attitude and put it where the sun don't shine. It certainly would fit there better than here at SZ.

Jeez, Nigel, how long do we have to put up with this crap...? How about, just one time, ripping the initial hate spewers a new one, and grabbing this one before it turns into 3 pages of negativity..?

What we got to do to get some adult behavior in here?

Common guys Scott will never come back when he reads this stuff

We could start by not feeling compelled to put up a five paragraph response to every single post that hits the board.

Is this a private party, or can anyone vent here?

ROTFLMAO @ dnj

I had decided not to post in this thread, but to call the Pa800 "dated" has nothing to do with reality. The Pa800 has the same sound engine as the brand new Korg M3 workstation. In comparison to the Pa1X this gives the following improvements:

1) 120 voice polyhony instead of 62
2) 16 oscillators pr. voice instead of 4
3) Equalizer on each track
4) New advanced effects algorithms
5) Bigger sample ROM with 150 new multisamples
6) The sample RAM has been doubled to 64 mb

In addition the Pa800 can connect to USB2 hard drives and flash drives - on the Pa1X you still have to use the floppy drive to exchange data!

Soon we will able to expand the Pa800 with a MP3 board that can playback two MP3 files at the same time with crossfading, pitch and tempo control! I don't know about any other current arranger keyboard that can do this (the Ketron Audya will do this too, but it won't be available until early next year).

And don't forget that the Pa800 weights only half as much as the Pa1X.

Sorry, but couldn't resist

Kind regards,
Tommy



[This message has been edited by TommyF (edited 04-17-2007).]

Re. dnj's and miden's posts just now (TommyF's just nipped in before me) . . .

Yeah, and to think that just a couple of weeks ago in another thread, I was hoping that Scott might be tempted to rejoin this forum.

Dat's anudder fine mess you've gotten me into.

[This message has been edited by renig (edited 04-17-2007).]