Gosh Rory, I've been thinking of how to respond to you without causing a controversy. You must know that as far as I'm concerned, you are one of the most talented and accomplished musicians on this board. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that we're in lock step in all other areas, particularly politically. I have no problem with that. I strongly believe in a two-party system.

In answer to your question, YES, I do believe that it is arrogant to think that there is no need for us English speakers to learn another language. What are we saying? that WE hold all the marbles so if they want to play in our backyard, let THEM do all that language-learnin' and stuff. I guess we should be grateful that the citizens of all the non-English speaking countries don't feel that way. There would be very little global communications going on. How many times have we heard how some great piece of literature cannot be fully enjoyed or appreciated unless read in the original language. To say (or imply) that such things are unimportant does hint at a vein of anti-intellectualism that seems to run through a part of America's political landscape.

I do agree with you, though, on getting our students back on track in math and science. If we fail to do that, we WILL be learning the language of whoever wins that (math, science, technology) war.

And finally, NO, I don't think it is condescending to point out areas in which our country could do a better job. The pursuit of knowledge and the desire to improve our ability to communicate with the rest of the world certainly seem like worthwhile goals to me.

BTW, hope things are going well with your recent commercial pursuits. If talent and professionalism is what it takes, you should do well.

chas