Hi,
I saw your other post in the GEM forum and had planned on not getting involved with this thread since I work for Generalmusic in the US. But then, I am also a musician/keyboardist/vocalist and have been performing since the 70's with groups and solo situations. I have used many types and brands of keyboards and still am very active in performing to this day. So....
I first became aware of GEM in the mid 80's when a sales rep happened into the store where I was working at the time. I was very impressed in the features, sounds and logical layout of the instruments that he showed me which at that time was the S2 and SX2 keyboard/workstations. Ever since then I have been a GEM fan. This is way before I ever thought I would someday work for this company, so what I am going to say here is based on my initial impression toward GEM products and absolutely not due to the fact that I now (as of 2001) work for GEM USA.
GEM products have always been innovative, not imitative. Over the years, other brands have copied ideas that originated in a GEM instrument. That is one thing that I really like about GEM. They seem to push technology a bit more than other companies who tend to play it safe by creating instruments that have many of the popular features of the day but offer nothing really new and exciting.
I am not saying that other companies don't come up with new ideas, it just seems that it happens more with GEM.This is obvious with the Genesys. The Genesys is similar to the other instruments you mentioned in that it is an arranger keyboard. However it is
very different in that it is also a true full-fledged professional workstation, i.e. extremely in-depth sound editing, 32 track sequencing with serious editing capabilities, included internal hard drive and CD-R/RW drive, an incredibly flexible system for storing your own presets, keyboard set-ups, etc.
To answer your specific questions;
1. What problems have users of this board experienced with the Sampler and can the sampler memory be expanded beyond the factory 16mb
The sampler memory cannot be increased beyond the factory memory. The sampling ability is just fine. Very good quality samples can be made with the instrument. The down side is the sample editing abilities (or lack thereof). The sampler can be useful for certain things, but if you have the desire to get into sampling in a big way, you are much better to use a program like Sound Forge or another audio/editor program on your PC. I would actually say the same thing when it comes to some of the other higher-end workstations with a sampling feature. They are good for sound effects or other basic sampling, but none of them can give you the flexibility of a PC based system.
There were a couple of forum members a while back that were looking for a flexitone sound and a long wind chimes sound. I took my Genesys Pro to a local music store and sampled the instruments for these fellows and it worked great.
2. Is the 64 note polyphony causing any problems with members that use multilayered sounds or complex sequences ?
Polyphony is a topic that can be discussed and argued about for days on end. I mentioned that I have been involved with keyboards for quite a few years. The first “Workstations” that hit the scenes were the Korg M1 with 16 voice polyphony and the Ensoniq ESQ-1 with 8 voice polyphony. The demo sequences on these instruments were pretty amazing given the number of available voices at any one time. Why, because the players who wrote and recorded those demos understood how to get the most out of what they had to work with. Was this cheating, heck no. It simply means that they mastered the use of the instrument. I have seen guys run out of polyphony even when they have multiple sound modules with 64 voice polyphony each and 32 or more MIDI channels at their disposal. This is simply attributed to their inexperience at arranging and sequencing. Yes, the more polyphony the better. But there are other things that pertain to the final sound produced. I.e. The quality of the individual sounds; how many actual voices are used per sound; etc.
3. How practical has the onboard CDR been in reality and
and
4 has anyone actually produced any work on this machine worthy of writing to CD for public consumption.
It is very handy to have a CD drive built into the instrument. As an example, I have a CD of MP3 files that I use for breaks while gigging. I used to carry and set-up a portable CD player, and now I can save myself the trouble by using the internal CD drive. A tiny example, but it is still a nice convenience.
Also when learning new songs from a CD, it is nice to have the CD playback and keyboard sound coming through one set of headphones without having to do any rigging up with a mixer, etc.
To clarify what you said “
worthy of writing to a CD” The Genesys records stereo audio at CD quality direct to the internal hard drive. These audio files can then be burned to a CD-R. So it is not a question of whether the instrument has the ability to deliver a quality result or not, that is dependant on the abilities of the player/singer/etc. that did the recording.
The CD burner is also great for creating backups of your personal data like custom presets, memories, styles and so forth.
-----------------------------------------------
I hope all this helps a bit in your decision making process. I am sure you will hear from other GEM and Genesys owners on these and other topics.
Best Regards,
Dave McMahan
Product Manager
Generalmusic USA
and Keyboardist/Vocalist for The Impact Band
www.impactband.com Disclaimer: To whom it may concern, I sincerely hope that none of the above sounds like marketing hype. It is just the way I talk naturally. I think most people can see through that kind of stuff, I know I can and hate when I feel that I am being hustled. If any of the above seems over the top, it is purely my enthusiasm and like for the instrument that is coming through.
[This message has been edited by WDMcM (edited 11-21-2004).]