Roland should do what Ketron did... announce something mind-bogglingly ahead of its' competitors, specs to make you drool down your bib, then sit on it for at least a couple of years while you try to figure out whether you CAN build something that equals those specs. Keep announcing delay after delay, then release it in an unfinished beta, and slowly do OS after OS to deliver only SOME of the promised features
In the meantime, everybody will discuss it ad nauseam, speculate and prognosticate, and generally keep it at the forefront of every potential arranger buyer's consciousness, and generate HUGE buzz and a favorable comparison to everything that is ACTUALLY released and working in the trenches. People will delay new purchases for MONTHS, sometimes years, in the hope that the thing will live up to the hype, and keep Roland (who won't have released ANYTHING for at least three years) at the forefront of everyone's consciousness.
And then, when the product finally ships, with several of the most groundbreaking features unable to be fully realized, or working in a fashion that customers could have already bought an arranger with this degree of crippled functionality long ago and a price point that would choke an elephant, you stay mostly silent and work excruciatingly slowly to fix the plethora of bugs that at first won't even let you use the thing in a pro situation, and then work begrudgingly on a manual so that existing owners have finally got some documentation about how to do things that other arrangers make easier in the first place...
That shouldn't hurt Roland's reputation even a little bit, should it?
I've even got a name for this vaporware boondoggle... The Roland V-Arranger
Two YEARS worth of hype without having to show anything... what company could resist that marketing opportunity? Free publicity and damage your competitors' sales for nothing more than a NAMM announcement!
So... hold off on that T3, keep delaying that PA2Xpro purchase.
The Roland V-Arranger is coming (soon)
(Roland, you owe me!
)