|
|
|
|
|
|
#399222 - 02/07/15 07:05 AM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
Exceptionally good strings, Rosetree, but, again, I must reinforce the fact that it's your playing skills that bring out the realism. Knowing how to phrase properly and play within the range of a string orchestra makes all the difference, in my opinion, and you have it down very well, indeed.
Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399331 - 02/09/15 04:35 PM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
However, judge for yourself, IMO these Roland SRX 04 strings from my Integra are also quite top notch, nearly comparable to the DSF ones, even if their sample size is much smaller, which causes shorter loops: http://youtu.be/J0kCNVzCIqs I just heard your SRX-04 video on YouTube again, and they do sound good, Rosetree. How would you rank the quality of the strings you have so far? DSF first, followed by SRX-04 second, and then Garritan? How about the SuperNatural strings in the Integra-7? Lastly, what about orchestral sounds besides strings?: Brass woodwinds, etc. Which keyboard/module or expansion would you say is best? Thanks for your consideration.
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399361 - 02/10/15 07:30 AM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
rosetree
Unregistered
|
Yes, I would rate the DSF strings first and the Roland SRX 04 second, maybe on a par with Garritan GPO Lite, depending on which samples in detail you need. The DSF provide more small and medium sections, while the SRX 04 also have samples of a big ensemble (which I used in my Adagio for Strings 'vast strings' version). Garritan has good solo strings (however with strong sampled vibrato, a matter of taste) and only one rather big section sample, which is partly very realistic, but odd in some low ranges and with a vibrato I don't like too much in the high range. So that's a matter of taste, too. I wouldn't rate the Integra SuperNatural strings too high. Newer doesn't always mean better. The SN-A sections are good, but a bit 'nasal', to me they are not better than the SRX 04, except the marcato version is good and quite realistic for fast movements. The SuperNatural solo strings are not ideal, I like the cello, but I haven't achieved realistic results forming a small ensemble with them yet. They don't have a sampled vibrato, so either you have a slightly artificial sounding vibrato, or none at all, which sounds a bit odd for solo strings, too. I did Bach's Air with a combination of SRX 04 and SN-A solo strings and deleted it from Youtube again, because the 'only SRX 04' version sounded more realistic. Listen to this official Roland demo of the SN-A violin - the attack is great, but the long tones with vibrato - IMO not realistic: https://soundcloud.com/rolandcom/sna0189?in=rolandcom/sets/201208-snatThat's all subjectiv of course. I'll come back to the other orchestral sounds later.
Edited by rosetree (02/10/15 07:31 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399378 - 02/10/15 10:16 AM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
I didn't quite care for Yamaha's recent weighted hammer actions, even on the CVP-609. I did get a quick go at a Yamaha CP-4 Stage Piano and liked it very much, so I believe it must be slightly different than on the CVP.
The past few years we've been using the el cheapo Yamaha P-85, and now the P-95, as controllers in the studio, mainly for the Tyros4. I have to say, I actually like their weighted hammer actions better than the higher priced instruments (the entry level P series do not have wooden keys) and think they are a great bang-for-the-buck if you want an inexpensive great feeling basic midi controller (no pitch bend, mod wheels or aftertouch), that's also lightweight and has a very decent built in piano sound.
Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399387 - 02/10/15 12:17 PM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Yes, I would rate the DSF strings first and the Roland SRX 04 second, maybe on a par with Garritan GPO Lite, depending on which samples in detail you need. The DSF provide more small and medium sections, while the SRX 04 also have samples of a big ensemble (which I used in my Adagio for Strings 'vast strings' version). Garritan has good solo strings (however with strong sampled vibrato, a matter of taste) and only one rather big section sample, which is partly very realistic, but odd in some low ranges and with a vibrato I don't like too much in the high range. So that's a matter of taste, too. I wouldn't rate the Integra SuperNatural strings too high. Newer doesn't always mean better. The SN-A sections are good, but a bit 'nasal', to me they are not better than the SRX 04, except the marcato version is good and quite realistic for fast movements. The SuperNatural solo strings are not ideal, I like the cello, but I haven't achieved realistic results forming a small ensemble with them yet. They don't have a sampled vibrato, so either you have a slightly artificial sounding vibrato, or none at all, which sounds a bit odd for solo strings, too. I did Bach's Air with a combination of SRX 04 and SN-A solo strings and deleted it from Youtube again, because the 'only SRX 04' version sounded more realistic. Listen to this official Roland demo of the SN-A violin - the attack is great, but the long tones with vibrato - IMO not realistic: https://soundcloud.com/rolandcom/sna0189?in=rolandcom/sets/201208-snatThat's all subjectiv of course. I'll come back to the other orchestral sounds later. Thanks very much, Rosetree, for that very detailed explanation and rating! Unfortunately, those who sell these expansions don't always include demoes, and their descriptions are often not very specific as to what you'll get. This hands-on review is just what I was looking for.
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399694 - 02/19/15 07:56 PM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Yes, I would rate the DSF strings first and the Roland SRX 04 second, maybe on a par with Garritan GPO Lite, depending on which samples in detail you need. The DSF provide more small and medium sections, while the SRX 04 also have samples of a big ensemble (which I used in my Adagio for Strings 'vast strings' version). Garritan has good solo strings (however with strong sampled vibrato, a matter of taste) and only one rather big section sample, which is partly very realistic, but odd in some low ranges and with a vibrato I don't like too much in the high range. So that's a matter of taste, too. I wouldn't rate the Integra SuperNatural strings too high. Newer doesn't always mean better. The SN-A sections are good, but a bit 'nasal', to me they are not better than the SRX 04, except the marcato version is good and quite realistic for fast movements. The SuperNatural solo strings are not ideal, I like the cello, but I haven't achieved realistic results forming a small ensemble with them yet. They don't have a sampled vibrato, so either you have a slightly artificial sounding vibrato, or none at all, which sounds a bit odd for solo strings, too. I did Bach's Air with a combination of SRX 04 and SN-A solo strings and deleted it from Youtube again, because the 'only SRX 04' version sounded more realistic. Listen to this official Roland demo of the SN-A violin - the attack is great, but the long tones with vibrato - IMO not realistic: https://soundcloud.com/rolandcom/sna0189?in=rolandcom/sets/201208-snatThat's all subjectiv of course. I'll come back to the other orchestral sounds later. Hi Rosetree, I was just wondering if you have a favorite for best orchestral brass, woodwinds and choir (Garritan or some other sound library for the Yamaha Motif XF, or perhaps the Integra-7 or other gear). Thanks in advance.
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399717 - 02/20/15 09:11 AM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
rosetree
Unregistered
|
Hi Mike, for orchestral brass, I rate the Roland SRX 10 best so far. It has a C-trumpet section that sounds 100% real. The trombones are realistic, too, only a bit low-volume and soft, which you can compensate by leveling the other sounds. The French horns are very realistic, too, as are the beautiful muted trumpet and trombone sections. Official demo: https://soundcloud.com/rolandcom/srx-10-...-brass-ensembleIn my opinion, some of the Korg M3 brass expansion sounds were equally realistic, the French horns even a bit more dynamic. (However, there were a few so-so trumpet sections in it, too, the bigband sections were not so good). https://soundcloud.com/korg/s008-f-horn-heroics-ex1?in=korg/sets/m3-xpanded-demosGarritan has a very good classical solo trumpet (recently praised by a pro trumpet player in my Youtube videos) and some good sections, but I didn't like them as much as the SRX10. IMO some of the preset Yamaha Motif XS/XF/MoXF brass sections are really good, too (e.g. medium brass section), but in the direct comparison they can't beat the SRX10 C-trumpets. So, for brass maybe: 1. Roland SRX 10 2. Korg M3 brass expansion (Kronos will be at least as good) 3. Garritan GPO Lite / Yamaha Motif XF presets For classical woodwinds (Clarinet, Oboe, Flute, English Horn), I like the Garritan woodwinds a lot, but I was even more fascinated by the Korg M3 woodwinds expansion. I rate the Motif preset woodwinds quite good, but not top. The Integra SuperNatural woodwinds are very good except if you use vibrato, which is again not sampled, but artificially created. The Integra's PCM woodwinds (especially SRX06) are good, but their age and limited wave data doesn't allow real highlights. So in summary for woodwinds (except sax): 1. Korg M3 woodwind expansion 2. Garritan GPO Lite 3. Integra SN-A woodwinds + SRX06 woodwinds combined 4. Yamaha Motif XF/MoXF Regarding choirs, I don't use them much in the MoXF, and I am very happy with the excellent, even if old, choirs of the Roland SRX06, and also the SuperNatural choirs of the Integra. Everything subjective of course! Hope it helps.
Edited by rosetree (02/20/15 09:13 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399729 - 02/20/15 11:46 AM
Re: DSF Symphonic Strings for Motif & MoxF - great!
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Hi Mike, for orchestral brass, I rate the Roland SRX 10 best so far. It has a C-trumpet section that sounds 100% real. The trombones are realistic, too, only a bit low-volume and soft, which you can compensate by leveling the other sounds. The French horns are very realistic, too, as are the beautiful muted trumpet and trombone sections. Official demo: https://soundcloud.com/rolandcom/srx-10-...-brass-ensembleIn my opinion, some of the Korg M3 brass expansion sounds were equally realistic, the French horns even a bit more dynamic. (However, there were a few so-so trumpet sections in it, too, the bigband sections were not so good). https://soundcloud.com/korg/s008-f-horn-heroics-ex1?in=korg/sets/m3-xpanded-demosGarritan has a very good classical solo trumpet (recently praised by a pro trumpet player in my Youtube videos) and some good sections, but I didn't like them as much as the SRX10. IMO some of the preset Yamaha Motif XS/XF/MoXF brass sections are really good, too (e.g. medium brass section), but in the direct comparison they can't beat the SRX10 C-trumpets. So, for brass maybe: 1. Roland SRX 10 2. Korg M3 brass expansion (Kronos will be at least as good) 3. Garritan GPO Lite / Yamaha Motif XF presets For classical woodwinds (Clarinet, Oboe, Flute, English Horn), I like the Garritan woodwinds a lot, but I was even more fascinated by the Korg M3 woodwinds expansion. I rate the Motif preset woodwinds quite good, but not top. The Integra SuperNatural woodwinds are very good except if you use vibrato, which is again not sampled, but artificially created. The Integra's PCM woodwinds (especially SRX06) are good, but their age and limited wave data doesn't allow real highlights. So in summary for woodwinds (except sax): 1. Korg M3 woodwind expansion 2. Garritan GPO Lite 3. Integra SN-A woodwinds + SRX06 woodwinds combined 4. Yamaha Motif XF/MoXF Regarding choirs, I don't use them much in the MoXF, and I am very happy with the excellent, even if old, choirs of the Roland SRX06, and also the SuperNatural choirs of the Integra. Everything subjective of course! Hope it helps. Hi Rosetree, I just came in from shoveling lots of snow (in -30 temperature with wind), and as I usually do, I check Synthzone before doing anything else, and was very happy to see your detailed answer! I wrote down on paper all your answers for future reference (when it comes time to buy more gear and sound libraries). I highly value your opinion, because you know from first-hand experience how all this gear sounds, and also because I like the same type of music (baroque) and am interested in the same sounds you are.Thank you for taking the time to answer in such a precise and methodical way. I haven't been able to find too many others who love to play Baroque and Classical music using electronic instruments, so I always look forward to hearing new pieces from you. From all the online demos I've heard so far, I agree with your conclusions. Now, I need to figure out if the Kurzweil Pc3 series of keyboards are even better than the above. Thanks again for all your help! Mike
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|