One thing I notice about this discussion is that people are making the wrong assumptions that the Audya’s OS is not finished.

I don’t hear any one say that it does not function as an arranger.
In fact, you have people say that they use it on a gig.

It has bugs that must be addressed and fixed.
They are constantly upgrading the OS.

Ketron was one of or if not the first to include audio loops in a style in an arranger (I don’t think Akai was doing that).


And, the persons complaining about the Audya missing features are those who are accustom to Korg (which is not in the same level as an Audya, T3 or G70).

Korg arrangers are more for players who want to be creative. Ketron, Yamaha and Roland are more for those who want to turn on the keyboard an play without adjusting it to their liking, and with out any creative input from them.


Now if people are wondering why more Audya owners are not bad mouthing the Audya, it is that they don’t want the company to go under and then they are left with no company to upgrade the product or make any more arrangers.

Kind of like the negative effect Roland arranger.com had on Roland arrangers to where it looks like that may have pushed Roland out of the arranger game.


Owners of any product would and should always look to the future and protect your investment.



[This message has been edited by to the genesys (edited 11-22-2009).]