Originally posted by AFG Music:
I know what you mean. but that Actual scene sound is in this case some one's property.
any real acoustic instruments and analog synths has certain type of sound and character and i think you know this.
For example, if you have 10 acoustic guitar from 10 different companies, each guitar sound different.
one of the reasons why fewer people are learning to play acoustic instruments and analog synth is sample-based electric music instruments.
it's injustices against acoustic instrument builders and analog synth makers to say you work hard to build an instrument with specific sounds and sound character, but sample-based music harddware Intrument companies see your instrument specific sounds and sound character like a real scene so they can digitally copy your work(sampling) and sell as a basis on their hardware.
[This message has been edited by AFG Music (edited 06-18-2010).]
Well said. I think that is the point a lot of persons are missing.
They do not see the original acoustic instrument as an instrument the same way they see an electronic instrument.
Here is another analogy: If someone creates a blueprints for a house, then some one takes a picture of that blueprint, then someone interns scans an image of the picture of the blueprint, with this discussion, it seems as if most persons would think that only the person who took the picture should have any protection.
But what about the person who created and worked on the original blue print.
The person who created the blueprint is equivalent to the acoustic instrument maker. The person who took the picture is equivalent to the person who samples. And the person who scans the picture is equivalent to the person who clones.
Previous Topic
Index
