Quote:
Originally posted by keybplayer:
... Ketron probably decided that USB 2.0 was NOT needed in the Audya because most people who purchased one would never take advantage of the higher data transfer rated USB 2.0 vs. measly USB 1.1. The cost associated with implementing USB 2.0 on the Audya vs. USB 1.1 is probably negligible, but why implement it at all if the majority of Audya owners will never take advantage of it anyway? The few who would take advantage of it doesn't factor into the equation for Ketron because they are looking at it from the "majority who won't" point of view...
All the best,
Mike


Are you sure about the Ketron being USB 1? After promulgating all these theories of why Ketron has used USB 1, you'd better have a good apology if you're proved wrong...