It happened that i agree with Diki on this, thats correct James but what if Microsoft
advertised it product that thats actually what that product does? Converting Samples?
Then responsibility falls on Microsoft as in here it falls on LionTracks it self.
This is advertised for years as an arranger and has nothing to do with devellopers,
it has to do with LionTracks, when i see something online and it says COFFEE MACHINE
i dont hold responsible the guy that made the power cord or the pot, i hold the factory that
bears its name on the machine, they sold it to me. LionTracks advertised this is an Arranger
and that means they have to take full responsibility for that, the guy that wrote StyleWorks
has nothing to do with that. If LionTracks advertised it as an arranger then they should've
taken care of that as customers would expect them to do so, come up with their own Arranger
software implementation or whatever it is. I cannot take your sounds and sell them to customers
while at the same time few notes are missing in the KMP and me telling the customers:
''Hey, its James's is fault, he didnt put them in there'' while i charge them for that.