Quote:
Originally posted by Irishacts:

As an arranger, we are not there yet. So far I would hope that people would accept that it has been demonstrated that it has all the abilities needed, and that the sound can sound like any typical arranger keyboard. So for function and ability there is no issue.

What remains is to now demonstrate it surpassing all that in a big way that's seriously noticeable.

There will be no A & B example uploaded. Not by mean anyway. I'm not interested in comparing the sounds off a closed keyboard to huge giga files. I would think anyone even half deaf would be easily able to tell the difference when listening to the style.

]


It is great that you are unraveling and demystifying much of what was misunderstood about the Mediastation.

The claim that was touted most often, was that the Mediastation could take a style from another high end arranger, at that time it was the Tyros2, and by subbing in the incredible VST (and GM) sounds of the MS into a T2 style, the result would be much better than the original.

I think you should put up the original style, and the Mediastation's "improved" version...lots of people have T2's here, or even an S910 could suffice.

Maybe you don't need to hear them compared, but I'm sure many here would like to A/B them..remember, this claim has been going on for quite some time, and it has never been substantiated.

If you're going to set the record straight, you may as well do it properly, so there is no doubt.

Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.